by popey on 7/11/24, 8:59 PM with 38 comments
by captn3m0 on 7/12/24, 12:25 AM
At one point Ubuntu changed the EOL tables on their Wiki from 5 years to 10 with no explanation about applicability/ESM - just calling it LTS.
It is among the longest pages on our website.
by frankjr on 7/11/24, 9:35 PM
by hs86 on 7/12/24, 10:12 AM
To my knowledge, only some comments hidden in /etc/apt/sources.list mention this, but the more honest approach would be to warn all users when they try to `apt install foo` some package from universe/multiverse. Or do it like RHEL with their EPEL repo and disable it by default.
But I guess they would have never gotten this popular if people saw that Ubuntu is only a few thousand packages compared to Debian's tens of thousands.
by n3storm on 7/11/24, 9:40 PM
by thinkst on 7/18/24, 11:52 AM
We were paying for Ubuntu Pro through an AWS subscription on 2k EC2 instances, and could not get Canonical to update a package with a CVSS 7.8 in the 18.04 LTS.
We've moved off Ubuntu Pro as a result. Blogged it at https://blog.thinkst.com/2024/07/unobtrusively-upgrading-ubu...
by arjvik on 7/11/24, 9:37 PM
Thankfully I'm not personally looking for this at the moment, I'm more than happy being my own sysadmin and running anything from Arch to Fedora CoreOS to OpenSUSE on my machines.
by BeefySwain on 7/12/24, 1:45 AM
Curious if this would actually be a solution. They state that fixes in Debian are down-streamed regardless of support, so if this fix wasn't down-streamed, then why would it be in Debian ?
by bravetraveler on 7/11/24, 9:28 PM
Wouldn't have to create it to consolidate platforms if they stopped making them so often!
They have three concurrent LTS releases when they need one. Maybe two. 18.04 is the python2 of distributions. Let it go.
Having worked in several places that relied on it... ESM is being the bad kind of enabler.
Fedora handles "The Snap Problem" -- many target distributions -- with 'fedpkg' and 'mock'. Software and machines on the build side. Not by degrading the end user experience. They do participate with Flatpak... but that's peer pressure more than anything.
Flatpak is more well-rounded IMO. Probably from being the broader answer. Maybe this all doesn't make an argument. Just a bunch of statements. I don't know.
Back on topic: I wonder what all of this Canonical stuff in particular is for/leads to. New software isn't scary; 'just' plan/test. It becomes scary when you get lazy here... so accept your involvement.
by markshuttle on 7/12/24, 4:17 PM
by cosmin800 on 7/12/24, 12:46 AM
by Suppafly on 7/11/24, 9:29 PM