from Hacker News

Kagi finally let me lay Google Search to rest

by miked85 on 10/12/23, 12:34 AM with 212 comments

  • by Lazare on 10/12/23, 2:14 AM

    Just chiming in here. My experience is:

    * Google search was good, but has been steadily getting worse. Over the last 1-3 years it's become actively unplesant.

    * DDG solves a lot of privacy issues, but the search quality is strictly worse than Google. I know people who use it preferentially, and I respect that, but personally Google search is already so bad than opting for something even worse is hard for me to accept. And I think almost every DDG user is familiar with having to fall back to Google to get a result.

    * Kagi solves the privacy issues and the search quality is excellent - certainly better than Google is today, and subjectively, feels as good at least as good as Google was at its heyday. And notably I have never needed to fall back to Google; it's just a strict upgrade. I absolutely feel it's worth the cost.

    I can't really predict if it will stay good; some of the decline in Google is no doubt just because they're the most popular SEO target, so it's possible if Kagi becomes wildly popular it'll be a victim of it's own success. And of course, Kagi's goals and principles may change with time, etc.

    But as of today, if you think you might get some value from really good search, and Kagi isn't wildly out of your price range, give it a shot.

  • by archildress on 10/12/23, 1:43 AM

    I really can't make clear enough how good Kagi is. I've tried all the competing emerging search engines as they've had their 5 minutes of fame. They don't compare to kagi. it's the first google rip and replace I've ever tried. Pony up the $10 a month and put your money where your mouth is on "let's pay for products instead of being sold to advertisers."
  • by adamsb6 on 10/12/23, 1:48 AM

    > It’s impossible to both provide the best search results and try to optimize for the highest amount of ad-clicks. And if you’re a public company with an ad-based business model, you are legally required to optimize for the latter.

    This is a widely held misconception, but there's no legal requirement to maximize profits. They're required to act in the interests of the corporation and its shareholders, but this is very broad and includes more than just wringing out every source of profit.

    I'm a recent Kagi convert, and I'd say that Google's search product declining in usefulness is eventually going to impact its profitability.

  • by simpaticoder on 10/12/23, 1:27 AM

    Looking forward to the inevitable "Kagi sells user data" investigative report. The simple truth is that unless they make themselves explicitly liable to users if they are ever caught doing this, that the irresistable urge to monetize user data will tempt even the most well-meaning firm into sin. The ONLY solution is to make 'sinning' an existential threat to the firm. IANAL but I believe this can be done if ownership agrees to voluntarily enter into something like a fiduciary arrangement with their users. This means writing a EULA that does not minimize the firm's risk, but instead increases it in specific, meaningful ways. Increasing client risk is something attorneys are absolutely allergic to, and will argue up and down about why the client shouldn't do it. I would say that, if the customers know and care about such a step, it could be a valuable PR and marketing move that demonstrates REAL integrity.

    As it is, we only believe that "users paying for services" will protect against data exfiltration because of very naive reasoning, or, perhaps more accurately, praying.

  • by upghost on 10/12/23, 1:51 AM

    I should probably add in that kagi has some secret modes.

    If you precede the search query with `!expert` you get an LLM search response.

    If you precede it with `!code` you get a GPT-4-ish tuned response. It’s… really good. And since you can do it from a browser bar if you make it your default browser, I find myself reaching for !expert at least 50% as often as ChatGPT these days. Also, it’s extremely good with citations. The !expert mode seems pretty darn up to date, no knowledge cutoff issues. I have no idea if it is search, doing a vector lookup, or they just bake the model every night. Totally magical.

    Also, I’m following the LLM stuff pretty closely these days — their universal summarized and their search LLM — no one else is doing that right now. It’s genuinely amazing.

  • by Yeri on 10/12/23, 1:46 AM

    Agreed -- been using Kagi since April 2022, and never looked back.

    Tried to convert my wife to use it, but she's too used to Google (and the integration with Maps, local recommendations for cafés and restaurants, etc) that don't work as well in Kagi (yet). But for day to day, proper searching, it's 100% better.

    And I can't stress enough how liberating it is to see the top results of the search are actually most likely the most relevant results (and not "they paid more"). Yesterday I had to set up a clean Windows laptop, and had to use Edge to install Chrome (or Firefox) and 1password: it's just pure lying to users: https://media.m.superuser.one/media_attachments/files/111/21... (that top banner with download 1password doesn't actually do anything, the next results, made to look like a real result with the sublinks etc is all lastpass cheating and paying to be in front of 1psw).

  • by justusthane on 10/12/23, 1:43 AM

    > It’s impossible to both provide the best search results and try to optimize for the highest amount of ad-clicks. And if you’re a public company with an ad-based business model, you are legally required to optimize for the latter.

    The enduring (and incorrect) myth of how fiduciary responsibility works.

  • by ketzo on 10/12/23, 2:12 AM

    So, one meta-layer of discussion up: do we think the recent surge of Kagi discussion on HN is indicative of a real wave?

    Or is “picking a different search engine” gonna be something only 1% of users ever do again?

    I honestly think that even if Kagi does remain pretty niche (<1% of internet searches, for a ballpark), that’s great if it can really serve that niche (so far… mostly HN-user-types, I would bet).

    But it seems hard to make money at that scale and with a non-advertising business model. So godspeed Kagi, I guess.

  • by lampiaio on 10/12/23, 1:56 AM

    Oh, I didn't know it was time for HN's biweekly Kagi post. Those are invaluable, I use them as a personal reminder for me to water my cactus.
  • by lapcat on 10/12/23, 1:53 AM

    I really wanted to like Kagi, and admittedly my experimentation did not last long, but contrary to the experience of other commenters, I found Kagi search results to be significantly worse than Google. Maybe it was just the specific subjects I was searching. The final straw for me was when I searched for air quality in my city, and the Kagi results were a total joke, mostly irrelevant.

    I would have been happy to pay if the results were good, but unfortunately I was disappointed by them.

  • by jdoss on 10/12/23, 1:36 AM

    I switched to Kagi earlier this year and I have found its search to be vastly better than Google's in almost every case. The only time I finding myself use Google over Kagi is for searching for local business numbers or Google Maps.

    If you are on the fence on paying for a search engine give it a shot for a month and you might be as surprised as to how good Kagi is as I was.

  • by jonjojojon on 10/12/23, 2:10 AM

    I think Kagi search quality has a coding bias. Searches related to physics,hardware,math are basically identical to google or noticeably worse. My coding related searches are usually much better with much less SEO spam than google. This might be a function of just how much larger the market for coding related content is online.
  • by Urgo on 10/12/23, 1:59 AM

    Been using Duck Duck Go for maybe three or so years now? It's very rare I fallback to google other then for google maps (!gm). I do make heavy use of ChatGPT and Bard though.

    I wish there was more example results then just "best headphones", "steve jobs", and "python exceptions". I'm interested, but not interested enough to sign up. Maybe its just me, but all the marketing and comments are why to switch away from google search.. which I already did.

    There is a docs page[1] on Kagi vs. DuckDuckGo but it doesn't really have any compelling reason to use Kagi from that. I'd love to see concrete examples of how Kagi has better results then DDG.

    [1] https://help.kagi.com/kagi/why-kagi/kagi-vs-duckduckgo.html

  • by necovek on 10/12/23, 2:40 AM

    I've switched over to Kagi as it was announced myself.

    However lately, I've found that it started sucking a lot more when it comes to localised search. I am actually not seeing the value and quality I've seen early on, and will likely stop paying for it as I increasingly do have to fall back to Google.

  • by Semaphor on 10/12/23, 2:24 AM

    > For example, setting Kagi as your default desktop search for Chromium, Firefox, or Safari browsers requires a browser extension and post-installation settings changes.

    Can’t speak for the mac-only browser, but for the two general browsers, it’s only a post-installation setting, the extension is if you don’t want to change the setting manually (including the private browsing session URL setting) and get some extra features.

  • by darkteflon on 10/12/23, 1:51 AM

    This is such an easy monthly sub for me. Given the importance of search to our daily lives and work, having your search engine provider re-rank results to optimise their own ad revenue at the cost of your own time and attention is insane. In retrospect.
  • by tynan on 10/12/23, 1:50 AM

    Just to chime in and add another datapoint, I switched to Kagi and expected that I'd eventually go back to Google (like I had when I switched to DDG), but the results are just as good or better and I'm happy to pay to not have ads or tracking.
  • by theshrike79 on 10/12/23, 5:39 AM

    Is Kagi really that good or is their Astroturfing game just next level?

    I've never heard anyone say anything bad about it - and we're still talking about a $10/month search engine. Something that has been historically free at all times.

  • by catgirlinspace on 10/12/23, 2:52 AM

    Have been using Kagi for around a month and a half now and have been loving it. The results do feel better compared to Bing, but hard to describe how exactly, they just do.
  • by andreagrandi on 10/14/23, 12:00 PM

    I use Kagi (along with DuckDuckGo) and I really appreciate the quality of their search results, but if you care about privacy do not use their Safari extension.

    Due to a Safari limitation, all the queries are leaked to the previously selected default search engine https://kagifeedback.org/d/1575-ios-extension-leaking-search...

    In addition to this, since all the search attempts are being redirected to Kagi, you can’t use any other search engine unless you deactivate the extension and this prevents you from trying the same query on different engines.

    P.S: as far as I understand, they don’t have much freedom with the implementation and everything would be much easier if Safari allowed to customise the search engines, but I’m not sure this limitation is being properly communicated to the users (unless I missed some warning during extension installation)

  • by mortify on 10/12/23, 1:52 AM

    Something like Kagi is going to have to make its case strongly before making $120/year sound appealing.

    Google's only advantage over other search engines is its ability to search forums more deeply. The build-in feature of diving into reddit, stack overflow, etc is often useful. After a few test searches, Kagi is adept at this as well.

    Other free search alternatives that I've been happy with include: Ecosia, Quant, or even startpage.

  • by malablaster on 10/12/23, 1:47 AM

    I almost bought Kagi. Initially I wanted Universal Summarizer. Then I realized I could install Edge browser (which is essentially Google-free Chrome) and the integrated, free GPT-4 would summarize for me. And I still haven’t had an “ah ha” moment comparing Kagi’s search results. I’m happy to keep trying for free next month, or whenever my free trial searches reset, until I’m sold on the value.
  • by gxs on 10/12/23, 2:16 AM

    I’m so desperate for an alternative to google that a post like this, combined with what I’ve heard about kagi in the past is enough to make me give it an honest try.

    I’ve grown such a disdain for google, far cry from when I stood in the long lines to buy the first android phone.

    I’m starting to feel the same way about Apple, in fact, I think if it weren’t for messages I’d actually be willing to try something else.

  • by guillemsola on 10/12/23, 9:31 AM

    This example on python exceptions on their sample queries... The second result is a very opinionated result about exceptions considered and anti pattern https://sobolevn.me/2019/02/python-exceptions-considered-an-...

    Maybe this was tweaked to be catchy for developers but I don't think is the right thing to see as the second entry.

    If you search for exceptions you want to learn how they work, that is what 99% of the people would need. An entry like this is dangerous for instance if you are just someone trying to learn about them.

    IMO this is a red flag about the quality for a search engine. Maybe they are just targeting seasoned tech people who would see this content interesting. But definitely not a search engine for the masses.

  • by shepherdjerred on 10/12/23, 2:41 AM

    What I love about Kagi is that I never find myself needing Google.

    Years ago when I tried out DDG, I found myself appending !g to every query, and I thought that Google Search would always have a place in my life, but Kagi results are _so_ good.

    So, once YouTube has a viable replacement I might be able to delete my Google account.

  • by MiddleEndian on 10/12/23, 4:00 AM

    This reminded me about my own free Kagi account. Searched for `emperor bed` and the article on my personal site about building my own emperor bed appeared as the 4th entry vs somewhere around the tenth on Google. I'll give it a shot as my default search shortcut for awhile.
  • by tentacleuno on 10/12/23, 1:34 AM

    I am quite interested by Kagi's model, and would like to try it. One issue is that I do find it a little pricey (it's roughly £110/yr just for web search).

    This seems like a shame. I'd love to understand more re: how they come up with those prices in the first place, if any information is available.

    It would also be interesting to explore how many of the people praising it here and elsewhere are paying customers.

  • by dotnet00 on 10/12/23, 3:02 AM

    I'm on the Kagi trial, so far it's the only search engine I've used where I haven't felt the need to fallback to Google. I'll be upgrading to the unlimited tier as soon as I get through the trial.
  • by sampli on 10/12/23, 1:52 AM

    Kagi is pretty cool, but I wish it had some more live features like Google has. (e.g seeing game scores in a nice format update in real time)
  • by mantra2 on 10/12/23, 3:10 AM

    Kagi seems cool to me and I appreciate what they’re doing but I’ve been using DDG for years now and find myself falling back to Google less and less. It has improved quite a bit for my personal use and I can’t imagine spending $100/year+ for search. I’d be game if it was a little less.
  • by Ephil012 on 10/12/23, 2:42 AM

    With all these comments about how Kagi is so much better than Google, I feel like I am living in a alternate world. My experience has been the exact opposite. I've been having to use !g so often on Kagi I turned it off as my default search engine. The thing is I really want to love Kagi, but can't. It just seems inferior in terms of parsing my search queries and returning relevant results.

    Let me give an example. On Kagi, I searched up "Overcoming addiction to Reddit". On Kagi, most of the top results are actually just Reddit posts about drug addiction / addiction in general and not Reddit addiction [1]. If you scroll down, the is a result about internet addiction, but that isn't what I asked for either. Only once you get to the very bottom do you actually get links about Reddit addiction itself. Even then, there aren't that many.

    If you do the same query on Google, I get much more results that are actually about Reddit addiction [2]. On top of that, the relevant results are way closer to the top than on Kagi. It even includes high quality links like a Hacker News post on Reddit addiction. I believe Kagi included the same link, but it was hidden all the way on the third page as opposed to being somewhat near the top on Google. Don't get me wrong, Google's results aren't perfect and it has a lot of irrelevant stuff show up in my query about Reddit addiction. But it's still better than Kagi.

    My theory is that Kagi just saw the words "overcoming addiction" and "Reddit" and assumed I wanted to look for links about addiction in general on Reddit. Basically it's almost like it did "overcoming addiction site:reddit.com" for the top results. Albeit, after the top results it does show links from other sources. Meanwhile, it seems Google did a better job at parsing the query and realizing I was looking up a specific type of addiction, a Reddit addiction. Kagi did not do this.

    My next problem with Kagi is just the lack of results in general. It seems Kagi likes to return a limited number of results per search. It seems it usually gives 20-30 results and sometimes gives more (~70 results) if you give it a very generic query. The problem with this is it makes Kagi terrible for research. In daily life, I never even read past the first few pages on Google. But when researching a niche topic for a paper, you sometimes need to go way past the first page to find what you're looking for. This might be because when doing research on something vague or niche it's hard to get accurate matches on the first page of search. As a result, having a large number of search result pages in general is useful for when this happens. But Kagi simply doesn't do this. It's limit on how many results it returns just kills the ability for you to actually go more in-depth without issuing a modified search query. I seriously doubt Kagi's index is literally so small it can only return around 70 something results at max, so I just have to think this is some self-imposed limitation which ultimately harms the search quality.

    Another problem I have with Kagi are lenses. Lenses get hyped up by them, but in practice I found them utterly terrible. I searched up Lo Mein without lenses on and my first results were some pretty high quality recipes. I then turned on the recipe lens and the quality noticeably decreased. Instead of returning Lo Mein recipes from actual recipe sites, it instead returns a Reddit post that links to a gif of someone making Lo Mein. Issue is that gif is actually on gfycat which is shut down. So the top result is useless. The rest of the results aren't even Lo Mein recipes, but instead chicken recipes for instance. So in the process of trying to use lenses to increase my search quality, it actually made it worse.

    Also, a tiny nit is that Kagi isn't as good at getting quick answers. If I look up a question on Google, it will usually display some quick summary at the top with the answer to the question. Kagi has quick answer too, but you have to manually click on it to get Kagi to generate the quick answer. I get they're a startup trying to save money, but this is just another reason for me to use Google over Kagi.

    As a whole, I haven't found Kagi to be useful at all like many commenters claim it is. I really wanted Kagi to work out as again I love the idea of Kagi. But ultimately, I can't justify using it over Google because the quality has just been so much worse in my experience. Ultimately, I am paying money for Kagi, yet I am getting a lower quality product than Google which is free. At that point, it doesn't make sense for me to continue with Kagi.

    1. https://kagi.com/search?q=overcoming+addiction+to+reddit

    2. https://www.google.com/search?q=overcoming+addiction+to+redd... (Google may show different results to you because Google might be customizing results based on past searches)

  • by wutwutwat on 10/12/23, 6:22 AM

    Maybe my shit is all being MITM’d but Google, DDG, and Kagi all spit out the same useless results. Doesn’t matter what I search for, and I’m not searching for anything special, just everyday random things. Search has regressed to ask Jeeves days imo
  • by rogeliodh on 10/12/23, 2:22 AM

    They should implement regional pricing. UD$10/month is too much in a lot of countries.
  • by northerdome on 10/12/23, 1:47 AM

    This was me with Neeva but they sold out. I fully expect Kagi to do the same unfortunately.
  • by bravetraveler on 10/12/23, 3:16 AM

    I'd be more inclined to sign up if there were AI-free [but still unlimited] plans.

    I'm willing to pay to a degree... but honestly, I'm not that compelled by AI/LLMs and get heartburn from utility billing.

  • by solarkraft on 10/12/23, 3:16 AM

    Piling onto the Kagi experience reports:

    I used it when it was free and while it was fine, I didn't feel enough of a difference to DuckDuckGo/Google for it to be worth it to switch permanently.

  • by snvzz on 10/12/23, 2:15 AM

    I would first try SearXNG[0].

    0. https://github.com/searxng/searxng

  • by EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK on 10/12/23, 7:22 AM

    Kagi has a lower resolution picture of the world simply because they don't have as many servers as Google.
  • by gwbas1c on 10/12/23, 3:00 PM

    IMO: Seems expensive, unless the subscription also came with some other services, like email and storage.
  • by renegat0x0 on 10/12/23, 7:04 AM

    There are several ways to measure search results. Someone should make analysis of Google results.

    I searched "Elon Musk" in kagi and Google. I see the results with more text on Kagi. It is more dense. Google shows me more of blank space.

    The second thing is domain variety. "Elon Musk" on google shows twice wikipedia, twice CNBC, twice new york times, twice guardian. Mainstream domains are shown several times, with similar titles. Kagi joins groups that nicely.

    I searched for "diablo 2 mods". I was expecting hobby pages, fan pages, with forums, mods, wallpapers, maps. It is all gone. Nobody hosts sites like that? The ones there were - are they gone? Has it all split into reddit, nexusmods, facebook groups? Can Google search facebook and reddit now easily? Why such groups are not showed on results, only r/diablo?

    I feel that whenever I search something media outlets appear first. Even when searching for mods ign shows with some articles.

    Is google a good tool for discovery, or just for searching a precise information like "how to solve this x compilation error"? Has Internet become a dull place because people are consoomers now, not creators? Or people are just focused on creating food images on an Instagram? There is no sense of wonder with results. Maybe my expectations are too high?

  • by dang on 10/12/23, 2:56 AM

    Related. Others?

    Ask HN: How to Pronounce Kagi? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37616169 - Sept 2023 (12 comments)

    Unlimited Kagi searches for $10 per month - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37603905 - Sept 2023 (944 comments)

    Kagi search is 6 times faster than Google - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37588686 - Sept 2023 (5 comments)

    Kagi Small Web - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37420281 - Sept 2023 (185 comments)

    Ask HN: Is paid search-engine model like Kagi viable? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37374900 - Sept 2023 (22 comments)

    Kagi Search Stats - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37315961 - Aug 2023 (55 comments)

    Kagi Number of Users and Searches Stats - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37313141 - Aug 2023 (6 comments)

    Ask HN: How can Kagi be so fast and customizable? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37065082 - Aug 2023 (15 comments)

    Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37006082 - Aug 2023 (485 comments)

    Kagi: Words You Cannot Use: 'Constitutional AI', 'Anthropic', 'Anthropic, PBC' - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36741153 - July 2023 (51 comments)

    Kagi raises $670k - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36517149 - June 2023 (359 comments)

    Updates to Kagi pricing plans – More searches, unrestricted AI tools - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36040346 - May 2023 (77 comments)

    Enhancements to the Kagi Search Experience - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35809082 - May 2023 (163 comments)

    Important Clarifications and Apology Regarding Kagis' Pricing Update - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35149788 - March 2023 (10 comments)

    Kagi – Paid Search Engine - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34179949 - Dec 2022 (166 comments)

    The Age of PageRank Is Over - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33537513 - Nov 2022 (373 comments)

    Kagi/Orion status update: First three months - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32676993 - Sept 2022 (191 comments)

    Kagi search and Orion browser enter public beta - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31584791 - June 2022 (201 comments)

    Kagi: A Premium Search Engine - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29835756 - Jan 2022 (221 comments)

    ---

    (Reposts are fine after a year or so, and links to past threads are just to satisfy curious readers)

  • by chx on 10/12/23, 1:45 AM

    I switched on Oct 3.

    I was beginning to see way too much of these weird domain name mirrors of things in Google Search instead of the real things and I was reading Doctorow on Google's enshittification and I said "OK, enough of this".

    I guess it's time to move Google Drive and Gmail as well. The latter is probably fastmail but where to put the Google Drive files? It's like 2TB.

  • by 2-718-281-828 on 10/12/23, 9:23 AM

    how good is kagi compared to google for languages other than english? german, russian, chinese etc

    does kagi also censor illegal content or content residing in a gray zone? like porn, streaming movies, torrenting, racism etc

    does kagi censor so called fake news and dangerous misinformation with regard to corona for example?

  • by titaniumtown on 10/12/23, 1:36 AM

    Honestly, I rather use Bing and get paid for searching. As a student with no income, I rather use something free.
  • by iansinnott on 10/12/23, 1:35 AM

    Recently I discovered there's no more "Non-commercial" lens.

    I'm still a happy Kagi user but I found that lens helpful for avoiding over-SEOd sites filled with affiliate links and was disappointed to see it gone.