by neilxdsouza on 6/23/15, 7:31 AM with 14 comments
by mryan on 6/23/15, 8:24 AM
Poorly.
Do you mean a Beowulf cluster of mobile phones? It seems like it would be woefully inefficient to say the least.
- each node in the cluster has an expensive screen attached to it, which would presumably be permanently disabled to reduce cooling/power costs. This is a waste of money. Same goes for bluetooth, accelerometers and anything else that is not directly contributing to the cluster. The cost of the screen etc. could have purchased more processors instead.
- temperature management would be incredibly inefficient. How would you cool a rack of 1000 phones/tablets? Server chassis are designed with this in mind. Phones/tablets are not.
It's an interesting idea to think about, but nobody is going to produce a cluster powered by iPhone 6s which is capable of competing (financially or computationally) with a cluster powered by servers designed for this purpose.
by fpvracing on 6/23/15, 8:26 AM
Are you suggesting that the economy of scale has reached a point where the smartphone would be more cost-effective even with those features?
by kopos on 6/23/15, 9:14 AM
Can the millions of phones be used to coordinate and build any sort of 'Cloud servers'? When SETI@Home used our desktops' idle screen saver time for its calculations, can these multi-core pocket computers be used for something?
by zubairq on 6/23/15, 8:05 AM