by charkubi on 3/30/15, 3:47 PM with 99 comments
by crimsonalucard on 3/30/15, 4:00 PM
by _red on 3/30/15, 4:37 PM
Years later I researched and found out about allicin and its presence in freshly crushed garlic.
In fact there are now theories that many of the cooking practices of "marinating in crushed garlic" was just as much to do about anti-bacterial effects as culinary.
by jimrandomh on 3/30/15, 4:04 PM
I don't think that's strong enough to be useful. This might be interesting if they can figure out the mechanism and use it to create a stronger antibiotic, but for the stage this is actually at, they're really overselling it.
by Symmetry on 3/30/15, 4:16 PM
http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/06/15/fish-now-by-prescriptio...
by rsuelzer on 3/30/15, 6:59 PM
by russellallen on 3/31/15, 10:00 AM
Bald's Leechbook is fascinating for many reasons. One in particular they refer to in the article - the local Anglo-Saxon remedies are in general lacking in theory and so more or less evidence based. Later medieval medicine was possibly in many ways worse - Roman and Greek ideas of the four humours were imported and applied as received truth. Later medicine was much more likely to take the approach of "Who are ya going to believe? Aristotle or your lyin' eyes?"
Anglo-Saxon medicine had no overarching theory to apply. So their salves and potions and magic incantations tended to be adhoc, complicated, and, occasionally, actually worked.
by benmarks on 3/30/15, 10:42 PM
Not all S. aureus is MRSA; wondering if this is just poor phrasing or if I'm misunderstanding something.
by matznerd on 3/31/15, 1:18 AM
They do not mix until you slice, chew, cut or press the garlic and rupture the barriers between them. They key is to wait 10 minutes after this process has occurred until you cook it, or you will remove most of the benefit of allicin. For example, putting freshly chopped garlic in the microwave for 30 seconds will take away 90% of the potential allicin content due to the heat destroying alliinase.
by snowwrestler on 3/30/15, 5:12 PM
I think the news here is historical (hey this crazy recipe works), not medical (hey this stuff might be better than anything we already know how to do).
by drcube on 3/30/15, 5:41 PM
I wouldn't be comfortable buying a pesticide based on that research, however.
by jacquesm on 3/30/15, 6:52 PM
by seren on 3/30/15, 4:03 PM
by kazinator on 3/30/15, 7:17 PM
Can you inject this into the bloodstream to clear an MRSA infection?
If not, then it's only useful as a topical antiseptic, which isn't newsworthy, since bleach, Lysol and various alcohols also kill MRSA.
by timdiggerm on 3/30/15, 4:15 PM
by mattbgates on 3/30/15, 10:50 PM
by enlightenedfool on 3/30/15, 6:27 PM
by wppick on 3/30/15, 4:05 PM
by gus_massa on 3/30/15, 4:05 PM
The problem is that when this is used frequently, the superbugs will evolve to survive to this treatment. If this result is confirmed, it will be good to have another alternative, but the new alternative will not last forever. (Perhaps 1000 years ago, there was a garlic-and-onion-resistant-superbug, and with the years they lost the mutation to survive this treatment.)
> They found the remedy killed up to 90% of MRSA bacteria and believe it is the effect of the recipe rather than one single ingredient.
Perhaps it a combination of a few drugs present in the ingredients, that can be produced artificially
by DigitalSea on 3/31/15, 1:10 AM
by kbart on 3/31/15, 7:54 AM
by lkiernan on 3/31/15, 7:58 AM
by mikecsh on 3/30/15, 4:18 PM
Obligatory XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1217/
by shimfish on 3/30/15, 6:06 PM
Believe? Don't you want to like, um, test that? You know, science.
This whole thing stinks of research grant bait.