by Justen on 3/27/15, 2:27 PM with 5 comments
by jjoonathan on 3/27/15, 5:46 PM
I'm aware that SRAM is 3-6x less dense, but it isn't uncommon these days to see people with >3x the DRAM they need, so this doesn't strike me as a terribly convincing justification.
I'm also aware that $/GB is insanely high for on-CPU SRAM, but that would also be the case for on-CPU DRAM, which is why DRAM is typically put on a separate die so that its process can be optimized independently. Does the SRAM process just not optimize as well? Does it have insane power/heat requirements? What goes wrong?
Or (puts on tinfoil hat) is JEDEC full of people who design DRAM memory controllers for a living?