by arthurgibson on 2/9/15, 7:49 PM with 43 comments
by mbesto on 2/9/15, 11:48 PM
1. Using YT as a proxy for overall attention. There are so many variables here at work, it's hard to begin to start why this number isn't a perfect science.
2. Advertising isn't a straight line number of attention to sales (even though most geeks in the FB era seem to think so). There are many of factors at play here (branding, image, communication, loyalty, engagement etc) and many are immeasurable.
Believe it or not, effectiveness (and therefore "waste") of ad campaigns are not just how many eyeballs see the ad. I reckon most CMO's wouldn't take this type of napkin math very seriously.
Note - I understand this type of content is for inbound marketing for Embedly, so this is probably quite effective. I'm personally pedantic about the data science behind it so others don't feel betrayed by it.
by RVijay007 on 2/9/15, 9:28 PM
by ctdonath on 2/9/15, 9:31 PM
Gotta wonder what that cost them in lost business (you gonna invest with a group that brags about throwing money away?).
by benjaminpv on 2/9/15, 9:35 PM
Here's wondering if the gossip mongers like Nick Denton might have to pay the price for their tomfoolery.
http://www.jta.org/2015/02/07/news-opinion/the-telegraph/whe...
by smackfu on 2/9/15, 8:08 PM
by PhantomGremlin on 2/9/15, 11:58 PM
Super Bowl ad spots are expensive —
ranging from $20M to $135M.
...
The cost refers specifically to the
Super Bowl ad spot, and not to production
of the commercial.
But Wikipedia[1] (and countless other links e.g.[2]) claim that a 30 second commercial cost about $4.5 million for the most recent Super Bowl.So how does an ad cost $135 million? Did I sleep thru a 15 minute ad? The numbers just don't add up. (pun intended)
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_advertising [2] http://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2014/01/29/yes-a-sup...
by kwntm on 2/9/15, 9:05 PM
by hayksaakian on 2/9/15, 9:38 PM
by Relaxx on 2/10/15, 2:26 AM
by iamleppert on 2/9/15, 10:43 PM
The is a connection, and the data is applicable, but only casually.
by ivanca on 2/9/15, 11:19 PM
by redmattred on 2/9/15, 8:36 PM
by _almosnow on 2/9/15, 9:20 PM