by jrslv on 2/7/15, 8:14 PM with 84 comments
by ffn on 2/7/15, 9:51 PM
That being said, I don't particularly agree on the "don't be modest" comment. Rather, it really should be "don't be ashamed of what you build" (with the caveat of no matter how shameful it is), that is, openly show people (both online and in real life) what you've built, the problems you're encountering, the solutions you've come up with, etc.
That is, proudly say to them "Hey, check this out, I built X, it's a Y, and I think it's great... but let me know what you think and don't be afraid of hurting my feelings."
And whether they reply with "Hey, you're right, it's great! Here's Z dollars for your startup", or (if you're testing on 4chan as I do) they say "OP, you suck, why does your site need this much JS? Go die in a fire, you worthless cuck", be modest and meek with your reply. Thank them for their input, actually consider the merit of what they're saying, don't get emotionally flustered or discouraged, and continue bumping your thread / iterating.
So I guess it's this really weird and almost conflicting mindset one has to be to have a good career experience; one needs to be proud and shameless about one's self and work, yet modest and meek when it comes to its reception and feedback.
by napoleond on 2/7/15, 10:04 PM
(a) My school didn't offer a software engineering degree. Very few in Canada do.
(b) The first electrical engineers (and mechanical engineers, and civil engineers) did not have degrees in that field--they invented it. The field of software engineering is still very new (especially compared to mech and civil), so it's not reasonable to expect everyone who practices it to have formal credentials.
(c) Being a stickler about credentials is a stupid way to behave. Obviously, engineering credentials are important safeguards in many fields (someone needs to approve the bridge, airplane part, etc) but software doesn't have the same safeguards. (Whether it should or not is a completely different discussion.)
(d) None of this is really what the article is about. It's simply saying that how we describe our profession is important. I work in software full-time nowadays, and although I still wear the ring I usually describe myself as a "software developer" when people ask. It doesn't matter though, because the next question is "what kind of software" and then I focus on the value of what my software does, relative to the person asking.
by FLUX-YOU on 2/7/15, 10:26 PM
How?! They delivered the product in the first place! There's a million idea guys looking for a Woz to their Jobs on Craigslist. How many Woz's do you see looking for their Jobs? CEOs are the damn cost center with their exobitant benefit package that still gets handed out even if they sink the company. Engineers add features and improve the workflow to make it easier to use. Engineers give Sales its ammo. Because it's not the actual engineer that's fired from the cannon means they're now a cost center?
I don't understand this shit and from what I've seen on the business side (especially with how the south does business), I think I'd rather shoot myself with a cannon before spending 20 years doing what I'm doing now.
by atarian on 2/7/15, 10:03 PM
But going back to the OT, I think Patrick is really talking about mindset. Basically don't sell yourself short.
by Anderkent on 2/7/15, 9:34 PM
by k-mcgrady on 2/7/15, 9:54 PM
At the the end of the day it doesn't matter. The only people who really care about titles are hiring managers and people trying to get hired. Once you're in the job, as long as you have the skills nothing else matters.
It seems like the debates around the use of the word hacker or startup. A waste of time.
by bshimmin on 2/7/15, 9:23 PM
by thedufer on 2/7/15, 9:26 PM
by ZanyProgrammer on 2/7/15, 9:31 PM
by auxym on 2/7/15, 10:06 PM
by jszymborski on 2/7/15, 10:06 PM
by Killswitch on 2/7/15, 9:36 PM
by rosstex on 2/7/15, 9:54 PM
by failed_ideas on 2/7/15, 9:49 PM
by xvirk on 2/7/15, 9:33 PM
by comrade1 on 2/7/15, 9:27 PM