by danseagrave on 12/5/14, 1:38 PM with 76 comments
by mabbo on 12/5/14, 3:18 PM
Lock people away in a cell for a decade, deny them a lot of basic human rights (like books) then when they're good and messed up in the head from it, let them lose on the public. If they re-offend, well, that's clearly a sign that they are just a bad person. Best lock them up again.
by KaiserPro on 12/5/14, 3:35 PM
Basically if you want to challenge a law, a judicial review is the only way you can go about it (going through the political process, writing to an MP and the like leaves you open to the whim of the press and "public opinion")
http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/18682/...
If this law goes through only those with significant amount of cash can ever challenge illegal laws. Combine that with the changes to legal aid, mean that only the rich will be able to attain justice.
by arethuza on 12/5/14, 2:29 PM
by Oletros on 12/5/14, 2:21 PM
by Shivetya on 12/5/14, 2:30 PM
You can screen for some, but I would expect all parcels to have some limited form of search. I would tend to think a better option would be to fix the availability of library services to prisoners, perhaps even only allowing access to the delivered books in a library setting; books are kept by the system in the library for the prisoners.
I understand that idea that reading is fundamental, but controlling what is in their environment is a big part of maintaining a safe and secure environment.