by serve_yay on 11/11/14, 3:51 PM
Ugh, these people are so frustrating. You ask them to remove your project and they "invite" you to "discuss" the matter. Garbage monsters.
by HarryHirsch on 11/11/14, 3:56 PM
They are spammers, they talk like spammers, and they need to be treated like the dregs of society they are. For starters, I see tht Bountysource is still on Github. Why didn't they get chucked off already, the scumbags? As of now, Github is enabling spam.
by chrisxcross on 11/11/14, 5:19 PM
Bountysource should invite projects to their program rather than removing them on request. As this discussion and previous ones have shown diffrent communities, diffrent maintainer even diffrent project member have diffrent opinios on introducing financial rewards into their projects and need to firstly discuss it. Afterwards they can approve or reject getting the offer listed on bs.
by pjc50 on 11/11/14, 4:06 PM
A good example of why mixing financial rewards with intrinsic reward turns into disaster.
by asadotzler on 11/11/14, 5:07 PM
Bountysource should allow project owners to delist their projects. Not doing so will simply lead to trademark and other infringement actions. Just because the code is licensed as open source doesn't mean you get to use the project's brand for your money making schemes.