by timtamboy63 on 10/24/14, 2:38 PM with 70 comments
by yummyfajitas on 10/24/14, 3:10 PM
This is nothing but stock market info porn. All you are doing is using web design to convince me to take seriously your opinions on whether GS or TWTR is going up or down. It's the web 2.0 version of an analyst in a nice suit. It looks cool, but no reason to believe there is real substance.
The fact of the matter is that if I'm actually going to be speculating on individual stocks (which I do, but mostly as a quant), I need a lot more info than this.
I don't want to be entirely negative, so I'm going to suggest a tool which I think might actually be handy, and could use with some nice presentation. Ask the user a little about themselves, and then suggest stocks/ETFs they can put money in to hedge their risks. E.g., if a person works in tech, suggest to them a portfolio that is disproportionately less tech heavy - that way, if their industry tanks, their retirement won't necessarily do the same. If a person expects lots of medical care later in life, suggest them a portfolio heavy on medical stocks so that if their expenses go up, their investment does too.
by encoderer on 10/24/14, 4:01 PM
The problem I have is, you may have built a better mouse trap here, but for the last 20 years the retail investor -- your customer -- has been the mouse. And few people in your industry acknowledge that.
The stock market has a built-in upward bias of 3-5 percent. It represents the premium over the risk free rate that entices people to invest in equity instead of debt (bonds, treasuries). So retail investors don't "lose" money but they have underperformed the market to a extent that is IMO criminal. Literally.
All of the education, services and tools (like yours) are teaching investing all wrong. Price targets? Made up numbers by analysts? What were the price targets on Netflix before it fell 100 handles (and then clawed half of it back)? The day before the drop CNBC said $600/share. How about GTAT? Jim Cramer loved that stock.
There are some people doing it right, though. Check out TastyTrade.com. These guys have made a massive investment in teaching the retail investor techniques for investing that don't rely on the magic of technical analysis or analyst prophecy. And even more awesome -- they built a trading platform that is free to use and provides tooling to support their principles, which are basically: do many small, high probability trades to give yourself many independent occurrences to smooth statistical variance, and let duration work for you. The platform is Dough.com
I'm obviously not affiliated, just a fan. And I don't mean to take away anything from what you've built. But I think we're just doing it wrong and i want to see that changed.
by ankurpatel on 10/24/14, 7:52 PM
by oomkiller on 10/24/14, 5:35 PM
by cornflake on 10/24/14, 3:17 PM
by drcode on 10/24/14, 3:06 PM
by mandeepj on 10/24/14, 5:35 PM
For market sentiment you are just showing tweets. How about if you just show if market sentiment is +ve or -ve?
I think you are taking only fundamental analysis into account to suggest buy or sell otherwise you would not suggest GPRO as a buy.
by eastbayjake on 10/24/14, 9:53 PM
by davesque on 10/24/14, 3:42 PM
by palakchokshi on 10/24/14, 4:44 PM
by andrea_s on 10/24/14, 3:54 PM
by rpedela on 10/24/14, 3:03 PM
by davidw on 10/24/14, 3:03 PM
by dschiptsov on 10/24/14, 4:57 PM
Sorry, I can't resist.)
by UXDork on 10/24/14, 5:00 PM
by UXDork on 10/24/14, 5:04 PM
by lordlarm on 10/24/14, 3:08 PM
by dataminer on 10/24/14, 3:51 PM
by frenchhugger on 10/25/14, 3:39 AM