by pelle on 10/17/14, 4:50 AM with 20 comments
by kauffj on 10/17/14, 12:54 PM
Another attribute of small is beautiful: (what we call) democracy.
The idea of democracy is to take the citizens’ location as fixed, and the identity of those in government as variable, the “representatives” matching the preferences of the people. But you can get similar results of representation, even under dictatorships, by varying the people’s location instead.
Assuming you are able to move to the canton or municipality where you feel the dictators represent your tastes & beliefs, such competition would put pressure on local municipal dictators to please taxpaying constituents so they stick around. So the smaller the size of political units (and the larger their number), the more democracy we get in the system.
by kauffj on 10/17/14, 12:49 PM
Larry Page is right when he says we need more opportunities to experiment with society. The fundamental problem with government is a lack of pressure to improve. In Hirschman's conception, it's become all voice, no exit.
It's completely possible this implementation could be shady or mismanged. The fact that Romer has left should be disconcerting. But as an idea it's terrific and we should all be excited.
by zcaceres on 10/17/14, 1:11 PM
However, Paul Romer's involvement and renunciation do not indicate what people think it does. Romer was also behaving badly just as the government has been. It was sort of a mutually-destructive power struggle that, sadly, hurt the people of Honduras most of all by jeopardizing the integrity of the reforms.
Further, the ideological aspects ('free market zones' etc) distract from a more important idea – namely that cities can incubate better policies more safely, cheaply, and effectively than if reforms are tried first at the national level. Think Lean Startup for political reform.
The use of neighborhoods and municipalities as testbeds for reform is politically neutral... and it ought to stay that way, contrary to the wishes of some in this article!
Please consider visiting www.startupcities.org for a practical alternative to the 'charter cities' idea.
by frozenport on 10/17/14, 7:43 AM
by ASneakyFox on 10/17/14, 8:28 AM
I sense it'll end up being a sweatshop farm and the "employees" will be paid so little that they won't be able to leave.
The us used to allow small towns like this. Employees would get paid in company minted currency. Then they'd only be able to shop at stores and restaurants owned by the company. This sort of thing is of course illegal now.
by anovikov on 10/17/14, 10:39 AM
by lotsofmangos on 10/17/14, 12:57 PM
by gph on 10/17/14, 5:15 AM