by pinkyand on 10/5/14, 5:05 PM with 27 comments
by ernestipark on 10/6/14, 1:29 AM
OCW Link: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-comput...
by th3iedkid on 10/5/14, 8:27 PM
He/She has certainly done a wonderful job but just curios at alternatives and reasons for choices they made..
Why not just refer to an article in the series of ... 'What every programmer should know about ...'
by dfox on 10/6/14, 12:50 AM
by derefr on 10/6/14, 3:00 AM
That's always been the biggest mystery to me: what are chip manufacturers doing differently with each of these "process nodes" that makes them able to do photolithography at slightly smaller scales, but with the scale only shrinking a little bit per five-year-interval?
Naively, I'd expect a process like photolithography to be mostly scale-invariant (you can lens a mask down to whatever size you like) down to a size where it hits a wall due to quantum effects. So when photolithography was invented, why didn't chips suddenly jump from 100um to 100nm scale?
by pacofvf on 10/6/14, 3:02 PM