by aaronchriscohen on 7/20/14, 4:54 PM with 13 comments
I realize that developing the app that facilitated this transaction is work but for the purposes of a single transaction is it truly 400% as much work?
Does anyone else have a problem with this?
Receipt image: http://goo.gl/z4HBdv
by mindslight on 7/20/14, 8:06 PM
These CRUD-on-a-service companies (Postmates, Uber, etc) aren't "disruption" but just an investment land rush to be the new rent-extracting middlemen. Let's just hope they're easily dislodged when an actual p2p economy finally develops.
by mattgibson on 7/20/14, 7:49 PM
I imagine the delivery guy does.
It's a free market though, so if that $21 turns out to be far more than is necessary for making the SAAS site, then a competitor will see it as an opportunity and undercut them eventually. Shouldn't take long if the business model is viable.
by grzaks on 7/21/14, 8:44 AM
Postmates creates value both for you and the delivery guy. After all - you used their service for some reason and paid for it right? You get the quality service, delivery guy gets the demand for his services.
Alternatively the delivery guy could develop an app for himself only, put it on the appstore and wait for you to download it. But he would never earn anything this way.
by sprite on 7/20/14, 8:49 PM
by _random_ on 7/20/14, 7:49 PM
by Someone1234 on 7/21/14, 2:26 PM
by Alex-Galapagos on 7/21/14, 6:19 AM
by spyglass on 7/20/14, 5:16 PM
See: the diamond industry.