by jervisfm on 4/27/14, 7:04 PM with 14 comments
by aetherspawn on 4/27/14, 9:50 PM
You should update your source to use the new 2014 tools. The verifications become part of the syntax.
by ballard on 4/28/14, 12:28 PM
In a positive direction, it would be nice to be able to be able to strip out more functionality and still produce a functional kernel. Unfortunately, I don't think this is scalable with autotools or any configuration management setups without having more #ifdefs than code. Haskell could be a good candidate for such a kernel framework, but I'm sure there are other functional and imperative languages that have better complex configuration mgmt support with formal verification.
by fab13n on 4/27/14, 9:21 PM
Given that the Banana is about twice as expensive, here's a subsidiary question: who has a use-case for which TWO Raspberries wouldn't have been powerful enough, but a Banana would have been?
by read on 4/28/14, 2:47 AM
I had the impression seL4 was the first microkernel formally proven to be secure.
by hga on 4/28/14, 12:49 AM
At least as these people are using SPARK/Ada.
Then again, maybe I should return to looking at Intel CPU and chipset errata....
On the third hand, these guys aren't using systems with ECC.... (http://ark.intel.com/products/64893/intel-core-i7-3520m-proc...).
by leccine on 4/27/14, 10:50 PM