by bjenik on 3/25/14, 10:56 PM with 50 comments
by froo on 3/26/14, 1:20 AM
This is either
a) Founders saw writing on the wall and decided to get paid early rather than have to compete with a company with much deeper pockets and a preexisting fanbase.
b) Facebook saw that Sony's announcement validated the space and decided to buy the company with most mindshare at the moment as it is an asset.
People have wondered why Microsoft didn't buy the company? Well, Oculus have seen what, $90M in funding so far? The investors would have wanted what.. 5X 10X ROI?
At 5X.. $450M is a metric fuckton (excuse the language) of money that they could throw at in-house development of something similar. I imagine having a VR kit that integrates heavily with Kinect has the potential to be huge, so they at least have to be thinking about it.
by psbp on 3/25/14, 11:23 PM
He's probably right. While Google and others are focusing on half-baked wearables as their key to the future, facebook just bought a huge chunk of the most likely successor.
by mtgx on 3/25/14, 11:39 PM
by ucha on 3/25/14, 11:48 PM
I would really like to understand how these sort of conflicts of interest are dealt with and if they are investigated by the SEC/other government body...
by zakelfassi on 3/26/14, 2:09 AM
by deletes on 3/26/14, 12:04 AM
by Gravityloss on 3/25/14, 11:59 PM
Maybe it is so hard.
by newhouseb on 3/26/14, 1:31 AM
This recode article has more detail which makes this much less of a sensationalist story: http://recode.net/2014/03/25/in-googles-shadow-facebooks-zuc...
by o0-0o on 3/26/14, 12:56 AM
by sarreph on 3/26/14, 12:23 AM
by barrkel on 3/25/14, 11:22 PM