by karenxcheng on 3/2/14, 6:05 AM with 135 comments
by mrkurt on 3/2/14, 7:30 AM
by brador on 3/2/14, 7:39 AM
In my opinion, yes. Sleepless nights, days off taking the child to medical appointments. This isn't magic and you can't wish these things away. It's hard to run a startup, it's even harder when you're not sleeping well. Just my opinion.
Edit - I covered post-pregnancy here, which also applies to fathers, my bad. The women only part would be the hormones and lack of sleep from around t-6 months.
by jgrahamc on 3/2/14, 7:50 AM
I think people take an unnecessarily negative view of pregnancy and child rearing. Sure you can enumerate distractions (such as sleepless nights). But how about enumerating positives: for example, what if having a baby made a founder, man or woman, happier and more fulfilled? That would have a positive effect on the start-up.
by chomp on 3/2/14, 7:36 AM
I do agree that most of this stuff is ingrained behavior that most people know is wrong, asking for a clarification usually can snap them out of it.
by abalone on 3/2/14, 8:17 AM
"What do you mean" is a nice easy response. I like it. It's not going to stop all assholes but it will filter out the ones are are ashamed of themselves, which is probably a lot. What it won't stop is the ones with pernicious superficial rationalizations for excluding women.. the "short people shouldn't be firefighters" crowd.
by taspeotis on 3/2/14, 7:43 AM
If someone's being a dick to piss you off saying these magic words might inflame the situation.
Best to keep them to examples of sexism.
by millstone on 3/2/14, 8:13 AM
If it was for voicing the thought, is there a more delicate way he should have phrased it? Or should he have just kept his mouth shut, denying her useful (if insensitive) feedback?
by DanBC on 3/2/14, 9:47 AM
I hope those people have rigorous documentation for hiring people and that reasons for rejection are kept on record.
by Mz on 3/2/14, 9:42 PM
What the investor said was probably just the uncomfortable truth coming out. IIRC, Paul Graham has made remarks not terribly unlike that. A lot of investors are leery of investing a woman of child-bearing age. Is that "unfair" to women? Perhaps. But I don't think saying it after the fact is "being an asshole." He did invest in her company. Now she needs to preform, baby or no baby.
This piece is not about "people being assholes." It is about men opening mouth and inserting foot, probably fairly innocently in both cases cited. A lot of remarks of that ilk are not intended as hostile. I think the phrase "what do you mean?" is probably a good one to use in such situations but I really think this article with this ugly title rooted in ugly assumptions does women more harm than good.
by wavefunction on 3/2/14, 7:56 AM
I don't know, I'm just a simple country programmer, your big city ways frighten and confuse me!
by bifrost on 3/2/14, 7:53 AM
I've made the offhand comparason of having a child to working for a variety of 1990's startups, I'm an ops guy and craptastic perl code made my sleep schedule less than ideal. I optimized and my life got easier.
The training from that made dealing with the wakeups a lot easier, and my wife and I worked out a schedule.
Working for a startup, like having a baby, requires good partners. If you don't have a good partner(s), life becomes significantly more complicated and I am not sure I'd recommend it.
Ask me about my ops strategy, stuff I design generally can do 99.999 uptime.
by cgriswald on 3/2/14, 7:53 AM
by lazyjones on 3/2/14, 4:35 PM
Founders, please choose your investors well.
by gcb0 on 3/2/14, 8:34 AM
of course not saying said investor is right, but that is probably what happen. not really a sexist thing though.
by nipponese on 3/2/14, 8:26 AM
by peteforde on 3/2/14, 8:13 AM
Warren Buffett figured out that hiring women was all-win long before most. Kudos to him.
by angelortega on 3/2/14, 9:56 AM
Stop being an asshole.