by CrunchyJams on 12/17/13, 3:22 PM with 68 comments
by tokenadult on 12/17/13, 4:53 PM
[2] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes#Attributed
by btbuildem on 12/17/13, 5:32 PM
The gist of it was that BTCChina's long game was to kill all competition (by being first, and zero fees), wait for the surge of new users to taper off (market saturation?), and start charging a fee once they've monopolized the market.
The OP further speculated that they must've interpreted the change of regulatory climate as disastrous, expect a major exodus, and have implemented trading fees to get at least some profit off the activity.
by _fs on 12/17/13, 5:09 PM
by deepinsand on 12/17/13, 5:09 PM
I fear this might be dire to the Bitcoin economy. Skirting wealth flight laws WAS Bitcoin's killer feature. All of the other Bitcoin use cases I know of are incremental in nature (ie, 2.5% savings on e-commerce transactions).
The open question is if enough of a hype-market was built to keep the other use cases alive. In the case of e-commerce, I assume a rational merchant only accepted Bitcoin because of 1) viral marketing channel 2) speculative hoarding.
The speculation MIGHT work out if the underlying Bitcoin economy was powered by the transaction volume and value of international wealth movement. Running forward it'll be from e-commerce and store of wealth, and I'm skeptical if that'll be enough.
by DigitalJack on 12/17/13, 4:42 PM
Most of the time I think there are just too many variables to so confidently point to one as the cause.
So when I hear on the radio that the Dow went down because of xyz I just chuckle. If we were really so good at pinpointing cause and effect in the markets, the people doing so would shut up and make money.
by drcode on 12/17/13, 4:07 PM
I think the most likely reason why BTCChina prices have reached parity with other exchanges is simply that the recent selloff has actually temporarily improved RMB liquidity in BTCChina accounts, since folks are stashing RMBs in their BTCChina accounts as they wait to jump back into the market.
...so despite the new Chinese government rules that should lower RMB liquidity, the markets seem to say that BTCChina RMB liquidity is actually pretty good for the time being.
by snake_plissken on 12/17/13, 10:06 PM
This is how I understand it: people already have dollar denominated accounts with Mt Gox, either by selling BTC on Mt Gox or depositing money there. They want to get these dollars out, but since it takes so long for Mt Gox to process these transactions and complete the requests, people are buying BTC on Mt Gox and transferring them to other exchanges that can process the withdrawals in a quicker fashion. This is in exchange for a discount on the USD/BTC rate they will get, i.e. they will lose the premium offered by Mt Gox so that a dollar denominated withdrawal request will happen more quickly on another exchange. The net result is a higher demand for Mt Gox BTC offers, and the premium results.
by kolev on 12/18/13, 12:31 AM
by foobarqux on 12/17/13, 6:11 PM
by Tycho on 12/17/13, 6:31 PM
by pepijndevos on 12/17/13, 6:03 PM
by quaffapint on 12/17/13, 9:01 PM
by pmorici on 12/17/13, 5:06 PM