by newsmaster on 10/28/13, 5:03 PM with 86 comments
by JoeAltmaier on 10/28/13, 5:47 PM
The problem is the usual: a single material isn't enough to make anything but the simple constructs. Almost everything is complex these days. Materials Science hasn't been a science for a century for nothing.
by ChuckMcM on 10/28/13, 6:23 PM
Also as others point out this is just the frame (and if you do the robotic crane thing you can add a roof. You might also be able to use your robotic crane to do joists for overhangs but the finish suffers as your joist material is exposed on the underside.
No doubt solvable problems but they take away from some of the 'magicalness' of fused deposition printing. Stereo lithography where the part is neutrally bouyant in the construction fluid doesn't have those issues but it has other issues associated with strength and material choices that can be laser activated.
For now doing a concrete lay-up would be pretty killer but building the forms on site isn't that hard and in both cases you need to transport the concrete at the last minute.
Bottom line I think the stuff that BluHomes [1] is doing is much more creative than trying to do this with 3D printing.
by brokentone on 10/28/13, 8:20 PM
This arm has an attachment for a polyurethane foam sprayer, a milling device, and a paint sprayer. In which case they can spray out a concrete form, mill it to get more precise (urethane foam is a bit imprecise), and paint it.
Then they want to get a series of these trucks to work together in a "hive" format... crazy kids.
by ohwp on 10/28/13, 5:49 PM
Concrete printing is not new so I wonder what is keeping them from building the printer over a year later.
by jguimont on 10/28/13, 5:43 PM
by JonSkeptic on 10/28/13, 5:36 PM
Interesting if true. I had no idea.
by marincounty on 10/29/13, 1:49 AM
by VladRussian2 on 10/28/13, 9:34 PM
The 3D printed houses will be a life-saver on Moon and Mars though.
by lifeisstillgood on 10/28/13, 7:31 PM
by angersock on 10/28/13, 5:28 PM
That said, can we at least be honest that having that much capital locked up in stupid consumer and enterprise gambles is actually a pretty obviously sub-optimal use of that money for the common good?
by locusm on 10/29/13, 12:29 AM
by VLM on 10/28/13, 5:26 PM
by bayesianhorse on 10/28/13, 9:21 PM
Where I see additional advantages is complicated buildings, for example pig stables where you want hundreds of bays, and maybe special channels for herding pigs etc.
Also for larger settlements once the robot is on-site it can just keep on going while the logistics train is a lot simpler than if they had to coordinate all the different types of parts.
by aaron695 on 10/28/13, 10:59 PM
Biggest point he makes is around the danger. It's also why autonomous cars might take off incredibly quick. Once the lawsuits start rolling in by people hurt/killed by people driving cars large companies will have to go autonomous pretty quick.
by 650REDHAIR on 10/28/13, 6:42 PM
Is there really a shortage of single family homes anywhere? Maybe in some sort of disaster area or 3rd world, but I imagine there are better/easier/cheaper alternatives for those situations.
by mattsfrey on 10/29/13, 3:39 AM
by Fundlab on 10/30/13, 2:36 AM
by ffrryuu on 10/28/13, 9:17 PM
by tehwalrus on 10/29/13, 9:17 AM