by mehrdad on 9/30/13, 6:53 PM with 97 comments
by unsigner on 9/30/13, 8:04 PM
The major problem with bike locks IMHO is their laughable resistance to brute force physical attacks, e.g. $100 hydraulic cutters. I don't think anyone around here bothers with picking the actual lock.
by vertr07 on 9/30/13, 8:05 PM
I'm a cyclist. Why would I want to mess with an electro lock when all I want to do is get on my bike and ride? This seems a symptom of 'an app for everything' syndrome.
by reneherse on 10/1/13, 12:13 AM
In my personal infrastructure and gear, I like redundancies that create soft modes of failure. The more we make the smartphone into a security hub (or a payment hub), the greater the cost & inconvenience of theft, loss, or damage of the device. Spreading these functions between phone, wallet, and keychain is a healthy "division of labor" that spreads failure risk.
E.G., you can steal my wallet, and you can steal my phone, but I'm still safely biking home from the bar because you didn't steal my keys.
However, yes please to more convenient bike locks. Just not increasing/concentrating device dependency and risk.
by grogenaut on 9/30/13, 7:34 PM
by 7952 on 9/30/13, 8:08 PM
by codex on 10/1/13, 12:42 AM
by rednovember on 10/3/13, 6:58 AM
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/haamlock-a-smarter-bike-lo... http://www.smartbikelock.com/ http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/social-lock-developers-kit...
by ssalenik on 9/30/13, 8:10 PM
I'd be worried that this thing won't handle the weather, especially if its only battery operated (no key).
by emhart on 10/1/13, 1:12 AM
There is an impressive amount of innovation when it comes to stealing bikes as they are low-risk, decent-value targets compared to cars or houses. In the past, attacks that originated with or were popularized on bike locks have paved the way for attacks on other locks that protected cars & electronics.
by evanlivingston on 9/30/13, 7:36 PM
by jpalomaki on 9/30/13, 8:22 PM
by stekoz on 9/30/13, 7:50 PM
by oldgregg on 9/30/13, 7:30 PM
by pimpl on 9/30/13, 7:50 PM
by 1945 on 9/30/13, 11:58 PM
by dvdhsu on 9/30/13, 8:06 PM
a) makes it far less convenient to unlock. Sure, the lock might unlock itself when I'm near it, but then what happens? Does the lock just fall to the ground? Do I still have to remove the lock from my bike? If so, how is this better than a combination lock?
b) makes it impossible to unlock remotely. Sure, it's great that I can tell my friends the exact location of my bike, but what's the purpose of that if I can't unlock it for them from afar? They still need my phone (effectively physical presence) before they can unlock and use my bike. If I had a combination lock, I could just tell them my passcode and they would be off. Why not just a combination lock?
These two problems make it unappetizing for customers. There seem to be a few main reasons why you have a Lockitron: 1) to go through the door without fishing your keys out or fudging with the lock, 2) so you can let other people in when you're not there, and 3) to know when people entered your house. In fact, these are pretty much the exact reasons Lockitron touts on its website: https://lockitron.com/preorder.
If a) and b) are true, most of the above three points have been not been addressed. 1) is a direct result of assumption a), and 2) and 3) are direct results of assumption b).
These problems aren't insurmountable, though. For a), some locks are physically attached to the bike. Here's an example of one: http://lovelybike.blogspot.com/2011/02/is-wheel-lock-useful-.... That way, when you walk up to the bike, it unlocks itself, and when you walk away, it locks itself. There's no need for any physical interaction between you and the lock. For b), you could include a cellular modem [1], which would allow you to remotely unlock your bike. Even more important, however, would be the added benefit of being able to track your bike if it were to be stolen (since with a "cafe lock" like the one I linked above, somebody could very well just carry it off).
1. The problem is trying to find a suitable data plan. The ideal one would be pay per kilobyte, with the SIM lasting forever. Since unlock and location requests take up very little bandwidth, you could pay a small amount, like $10, for a few megabytes. That should be enough for quite a few requests.
by dictum on 9/30/13, 11:27 PM
by highace on 9/30/13, 8:00 PM
by slater on 9/30/13, 7:32 PM