by dysruption on 8/25/13, 4:23 AM with 100 comments
by JumpCrisscross on 8/25/13, 6:30 AM
A challenge with a volatile pair like BTC-USD is keeping the portfolio delta hedged, i.e. neutral with regards to movements in BTC-USD. Without the ability to even borrow BTC effectively this becomes difficult to do cost-effectively. That said, a volatile pair in a fragmented market allows for market making sans leverage.
Taking a space arbitrage, as the author presented, and executing it as a space-time trade, as the author presented (buying in one place, waiting, selling in another), is not arbitrage.
by noonespecial on 8/25/13, 4:36 AM
by STRML on 8/25/13, 5:26 AM
This is why trading channels like #bitcoinotc discourage any use of paypal - but for times where you have to use it, there's the trust system.
by vbuterin on 8/25/13, 6:04 AM
by nullc on 8/25/13, 8:26 AM
Even when someone isn't claiming their account was hacked (which would be a problem no amount of cryptographic proof would solve) paypal simply doesn't care. I guess that really sums up paypal: Paypal doesn't care.
by downandout on 8/25/13, 6:35 AM
One person could easily act as buyer and seller. Seller receives payment and withdraws it to a virtual bank account attached to a random prepaid credit card that can be bought at any store with cash, then "buyer" (the same person operating a different account) contacts PayPal and claims they never received it from the evil seller. PayPal must reverse the transaction and eat the loss because it was against their policies for the transaction to ever have taken place. There is some work involved, but even just one $300 transaction per day is certainly plenty of money for alot of the kinds of people that would do this.
by unclebucknasty on 8/25/13, 2:42 PM
Of course, we don't purposely do business with anyone from China, but they go to great lengths to cover their origin, even employing Mechanical Turk workers to do some of their dirty work. The guy who purposely sold BTC to someone out of China was literally begging for what he got.
And these guys are virtually untouchable. We are a small business and we see a ton of this stuff, so I can imagine what larger businesses must experience. eBay alone must be the conduit for tens or hundreds of millions in fraud from China.
Amidst all of the talk about stolen IP, military secrets, etc. emanating from China, the likely billions of dollars in fraud targeted at American consumers and businesses is the great untold story.
by tadfisher on 8/25/13, 5:29 AM
I was also under the impression that PayPal does not allow selling Bitcoin or Bitcoin hardware. This transaction should have been stopped automatically, and it's a shame Ebay doesn't have automatic tools to stop blatant abuse of their own policies.
by badman_ting on 8/25/13, 1:19 PM
by cheeyoonlee on 8/25/13, 6:31 AM
by patrickk on 8/25/13, 1:44 PM
It's slower, and there's the slight cost of postage, but as least you have proof of postage as it's technically a physical item.
eBay sellers who sold virtual goods got caught a few years ago when eBay changed their policy on virtual items, but I've noticed sellers often now delivery the item via email but also on a burned CD or whatever to skirt the rules.
by vizzah on 8/25/13, 11:34 AM
by t0 on 8/25/13, 5:54 AM
by fexl on 8/25/13, 2:10 PM
http://stakeventures.com/articles/2012/03/07/the-may-scale-o...
by ck2 on 8/25/13, 5:30 AM
But you can also block non-US buyers I believe which will slightly reduce your risk.
by yelnatz on 8/25/13, 5:24 AM
People buying your bitcoins for 100-200% above market price.
After you send the bitcoins, they do a charge back on you.
Can't get your bitcoins back and Paypal is on the buyer's side. SOL.
by mthoms on 8/25/13, 6:15 AM
Kinda takes the point out of bitcoin though doesn't it?
by Havoc on 8/25/13, 12:33 PM
So much hassle to cover VPN costs...
by marban on 8/25/13, 6:30 AM
by tghw on 8/25/13, 5:20 AM
by robryan on 8/25/13, 6:54 AM
It is not enough just to show them some online tracking which shows that the item arrived (even in some cases if it has a signature verification attached).
by mortdeus on 8/25/13, 11:08 AM
http://bitcoinfan.blogspot.com/2011/12/why-selling-bitcoins-...
If something seems too good to be true; it probably is.
by LancerSykera on 8/25/13, 8:28 AM
by amenod on 8/25/13, 7:01 AM
by PaulHoule on 8/25/13, 2:11 PM
by markdown on 8/25/13, 9:50 AM
by patrikr on 8/25/13, 6:48 AM
by mangotree on 8/25/13, 6:16 AM
by C1D on 8/25/13, 8:01 AM
by tuananh on 8/25/13, 5:40 AM
by Helianthus on 8/25/13, 7:10 AM
This is how someone becomes greedy.
>As an advocate of privacy, Bitcoin intrigued me at a fundamental level. Trying to make money was (hopefully) merely a side effect.
Just a side effect!
>I would be scraping maybe $5-10 every BTC, and I would have to wait weeks to see the money. I also had little capital. My interest faltered.
Wow, what an academic undertaking!
But wait, he goes full casino.
>No way. Too good to be true. I know what you're thinking, there's no such thing as a free lunch, PayPal is an insecure way of trading BTC, etc. I wasn't really thinking at the time.
As far as I'm concerned anyone who is into Bitcoin has no right to be angry at Wall Street, because they get sucked into the same damn game.
by consonants on 8/25/13, 5:51 AM
This just further confirms my suspicions that you have to be retarded to get involved with bitcoin. No group of people is so easily and quickly persuaded into losing their money, and so readily eager to repeat said behavior over and over again, than bitcoiners.
by pbreit on 8/25/13, 6:29 AM
by bingeboy on 8/25/13, 6:24 AM
by ydnaod on 8/25/13, 5:14 AM