by calanya on 6/9/13, 2:48 PM with 59 comments
by tyang on 6/9/13, 4:37 PM
No GPS/maps system seems to offer the option for FasTrak or carpool lane.
No GPS/maps system offers a way to tell a driver in a carpool lane if they have to change several lanes to the right to merge onto another freeway, or if there is a new carpool lane opening up to your left that takes you directly onto the next freeway you way to get on.
This is what happens when you have an oligopoly (Garmin, Google/Waze, Apple) and everyone's product, design and sales people are in the Valley or Tel Aviv and not more driver-centric cities with much more traffic and orders of magnitude more route options like Los Angeles.
by nlh on 6/9/13, 4:26 PM
I'd thought a FB acquisition would have been very important for FB -- it would have given them user-provided location info down to the foot for 50M people, which seems to me right up FB's alley (Where are you? Where are your friends? Where are you going? Where are they going?).
For Google, this will obviously cement their domination in the mapping space. As it is, they're so vastly far ahead than others (I think I heard from a friend who works there that they have 10,000+ people on the Maps team worldwide?)
Either way, Waze is awesome and despite the cynicism around what the big guys sometimes do, I can only imagine this making the app better and better.
by vxNsr on 6/9/13, 4:32 PM
This is a competitor to google's maps, the only thing they'd do is shut it down (or at least not make anymore updates, ah-la sparrow) and not integrate the ideas into Gmaps.
From the founders standpoint this makes total sense, though, it's obvious this was the end game because they had no money-making business model.
by beagle3 on 6/9/13, 3:31 PM
Map was never free data - I think they started with OSM, but later switched to a proprietary data source (and of course, they are crowdsourcing more data and updates from users)
by badclient on 6/9/13, 7:47 PM
by Tloewald on 6/9/13, 3:51 PM
by laacz on 6/10/13, 6:02 AM
I do not believe (anymore) that google could acquire Waze and leave it as a standalone product. Which would mean lots of compromises in terms of community interaction because google has different approach to this than Waze does.
Even more - waze approach to handling UGC in terms of map editing is somewhat not perfect, but with google involvement it could be discarded (not fixed), since it's not trivial to come up with better way.
Google, i believe, is more interested in traffic data than in community map editing, but latter one gives Waze lots of its appeal.
by atirip on 6/9/13, 5:15 PM
by techaddict009 on 6/9/13, 6:26 PM
by arindone on 6/9/13, 11:45 PM
by slacka on 6/9/13, 5:42 PM
by danielcampos93 on 6/10/13, 12:34 AM
by salimmadjd on 6/9/13, 3:47 PM