by allangrant on 1/16/13, 7:14 PM with 73 comments
by iamleppert on 1/16/13, 10:20 PM
On the surface it sounds like a good idea, but it is nothing more than lipstick on a pig, plain old recruiters. You're better off using multiple recruiters, who will expose you to many companies and get you the best possible price.
by cyborg on 1/16/13, 11:22 PM
by donretag on 1/16/13, 7:41 PM
They are still curated with a manual selection process, in other words they are still recruiters. A true disruption would need to occur for every locale. Not everyone is looking to move to Silicon Valley and not only Silicon Valley companies are looking to hire.
by T-hawk on 1/17/13, 2:45 AM
- Posting a picture is a legal minefield for US employers. Companies literally don't want to know anything about your age/race/sex at the screening stage for fear of a discrimination lawsuit. The only safe policy is to ignore/reject all candidate applications with a picture. (It's not illegal for the employer to know or even ask, but it's illegal to make decisions based on such information, and the best way to convince a belligerent labor attorney that a decision wasn't discriminatory is to never possess the information in the first place.)
- The salary box has a hilarious pair of up/down arrows for increments of 1. Yeah I'm going to click 110,000 times to enter my desired salary. :)
- Am I blind or is there nowhere to list skills/responsibilities/experience under the work experience section? Or is that the point, to avoid that stale format?
by axlerunner on 1/16/13, 8:04 PM
by sandis on 1/16/13, 7:26 PM
by robomartin on 1/16/13, 10:26 PM
I've been on both sides of the equation. I've used recruiters to try and find people and have used recruiters to try and find work.
On the receiving end it is always shocking to see someone ask you for a $25K fee to hire a $100K employee. I'd rather give the employee more money.
At best a recruiter should be perfectly happy with a 5% finder's fee. Why are they asking to get paid the equivalent of what a person will take a quarter of the year to earn?
This is particularly true in this age of database-driven recruiting. It costs them just about zero to have you in a database.
by bcbrown on 1/16/13, 8:11 PM
by Cub3 on 1/16/13, 10:56 PM
email I got at the time said "We're reviewing developer applications over the coming week" and there seems to be no way to delete my account now... so my information is sitting in triage
by blaines on 1/16/13, 8:23 PM
AMA
by n9com on 1/16/13, 10:32 PM
by chetan51 on 1/16/13, 10:15 PM
by cjbprime on 1/17/13, 1:42 AM
by pairing on 1/17/13, 7:34 AM
by codegeek on 1/16/13, 8:01 PM
by robomartin on 1/16/13, 10:14 PM
What does that mean? Somewhere else it says that it is free to developers. Is the hired developer receiving a portion of the fee you charge the employer?
by elliottcarlson on 1/16/13, 8:36 PM
by jsemar on 1/16/13, 10:28 PM
by BayAreaDev on 1/17/13, 1:53 AM