by t3hprogrammer on 10/13/12, 1:13 AM with 20 comments
by nkoren on 10/13/12, 7:27 AM
But I bet it is quite nice on a higher-speed connection.
This raises a question for me: what is the best way to simulate/create a low-speed connection, for UI testing purposes?
by doesnt_know on 10/13/12, 6:06 AM
This wouldn't be a big problem, but the entire thing seems to rely on you going very slowly and only click one at a time and wait for it to load.
If I click another photo during that loading period, it mashes up the photos [1]. Scrolling down while a photo is in the center also doesn't appear to work well, if I click another photo it tries to bring it up and cuts them up [2]. Looks like it could do with some more testing my friend.
by chapel on 10/13/12, 2:51 AM
by mistagrrr on 10/13/12, 5:00 AM
by olympus on 10/13/12, 3:49 AM
by kkwok on 10/13/12, 2:02 AM
Some feedback: When you have a photo being viewed and you click a thumbnail from the bottom or top rows, the picture changes, but the thumbnail disappears.
Also, when you do this the new picture renders not as smoothly.
by citricsquid on 10/13/12, 3:12 AM
by Axsuul on 10/13/12, 3:31 AM
by Ian999 on 10/13/12, 2:56 AM
by tylerlh on 10/13/12, 1:52 AM
by cool_guy on 10/13/12, 6:02 AM