by SchwKatze on 6/20/25, 6:37 PM with 48 comments
by nine_zeros on 6/20/25, 8:21 PM
E.g. Amazon, Meta etc. have terrible work cultures. Their terribleness got exposed via whiney digital watering holes, at scale. This is useful information for anyone considering jobs at these places. Without these insights, you wouldn't know that you are merely being hired to be fired.
Avoid whiney watering holes but after collecting required information.
by atomicnumber3 on 6/21/25, 5:39 AM
Let me tell you a story. There was once a company. Things were great. Then ownership changed and things were not. People complained - and rightfully so. But nothing was done about it. So the whiners left. Then it was peaceful again - the only people left were complacent. Then the company died because the problems never got fixed and the owner couldn't figure it out once all the complainers - the people who knew what it should be like - left.
So, sure, some people are just natural born whiners who will never be happy. But some people just have good taste or instincts and can tell when stuff is broken. I'd say ignore them at your own risk.
And on the other side of the table - if shit is broken and you don't like it - is OP suggestion we just quit? Well, what about the poor sod who takes our seat next? And what about the next place we join - a seat likely vacated by someone who themselves had had enough? It's the tragedy of the commons. If we all just keep skipping out after 1-3 year stints, just to get a fresh set of problems, well, everywhere is just going to suck.
I really think this is the most likely reason software engineers will unionize - this realizing that 99% of companies are helmed by incompetent lottery winners and have been coasting on that initial capital/revenue infusion ever since.
by volkk on 6/20/25, 8:39 PM
by mdavid626 on 6/21/25, 7:46 AM
by kixiQu on 6/20/25, 11:03 PM
by lazyant on 6/20/25, 11:19 PM
by bigcat12345678 on 6/20/25, 11:41 PM
My advice: avoid positive echo chamber, unless they reveal genuine behind-scene facts.
Negativity is never a problem, people routinely sacrifice a lot for meaningful objective and reasonable leaders. When they turn negative, it's primarily there isn't a positive feedback loop in the environment.
But what's really happening now is that people are instinctively sugar-coating their meaningless job to lure outsiders for their own ego or whatever.
by temp0826 on 6/20/25, 8:25 PM
</whiny rant>
by wavemode on 6/20/25, 8:14 PM
I wish. I've worked for startups where I would've killed to have such a space, where people actually felt free to criticize the way things were going.
Toxic positivity is a thing too.
by OutOfHere on 6/20/25, 9:10 PM
The real problem with criticism is that management doesn't like bad news to be advertised, so they punish those who speak out. As such, it's not wise in the short term to illuminate bad truths if one seeks job security. If one seeks firm security, however, then honestly addressing all criticisms is the way to get there.
Another observation about criticism is that it can often be falsely mistaken for cynicism.