by neonate on 6/15/25, 10:02 PM
by hermitcrab on 6/15/25, 10:45 PM
I watched David Attenborough's recent film 'Ocean' on a big screen. The footage of bottom trawling was really shocking. I don't understand how that has been allowed to continue in UK coastal waters, let alone to be subsidised in marine protected areas. Madness. It's like napalming a forest to get a few deer. Thankfully things may be changing:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-proposes-to-ex...
Don't know how much of that was due to the film.
by bayarearefugee on 6/15/25, 10:01 PM
I think that not seeing how the story ends will be a blessing in disguise.
(I do not share his optimism that we fix this, the forces of Line Must Go Up are going to win... at least until we all rapidly lose)
by bdcravens on 6/16/25, 7:19 AM
As I am 48, I can't help but feel "old", especially given the spaces I find myself (ie, a continually changing industry, with the most active feeling like they're much younger). I really appreciate the perspective of someone who is still "active" and who spent more time living before I was born than I have since.
by deadbabe on 6/16/25, 12:49 AM
We’re not here to see how our story ends, we’re here to experience and live in the world that was someone else’s ending, that they never got to see.
by Kiyo-Lynn on 6/16/25, 7:36 AM
It’s inspiring to see someone at 99 still speak with so much passion about the ocean. Hearing him say he won’t see how it ends feels heavy.
The part comparing bottom trawling to bulldozing underwater forests was powerful. But the recovery of sea otters and whales gives some hope.
by malux85 on 6/15/25, 10:09 PM
Nobody sees how the story ends
by kleiba on 6/16/25, 12:26 AM
Amazing how many pop-ups I have to click away. It's almost like being back in the 90s.
by TheRealWatson on 6/15/25, 11:02 PM
Started reading and immediately hearing it narrated in his voice.
by vivzkestrel on 6/16/25, 5:18 AM
The sad part of our human existence is that none of us ever live to see how our story ends. We "spawn" at a random point in time and "vanish" at another. Ageing is being worked on vigorously and while we did change our lifespan from 40 years to 80 years of existence thanks to modern science, in order for us to truly comprehend changes on a universal scale, average human lifespan would need to be 50000 years long. That way you'll see species evolve, continents move, quasars explode, maybe even Betelguese explode?
by markus_zhang on 6/15/25, 11:33 PM
David Attenborough narrated some of my favorite paleontology documentaries.
by Silhouette on 6/15/25, 10:33 PM
None of us see the end of the story but I do fear that the story could change when we inevitably lose a passionate advocate in Sir David whose credibility on this issue has been unchallengeable.
I take some comfort from the younger generations who are now growing up with a much greater awareness of the natural environment and the damage we humans can do to it and a much lower tolerance for political sophistry and capitalist all-about-the-money "ethics". With the selfishness of politics in much of the world today I think things will probably get worse before they get better. I still hope that we won't cross any points of no return as those younger people gain influence and those of older generations who are not always as enlightened and concerned as Sir David also leave us.
I think those younger generations will have better chances if there is a highly visible advocate for protecting the natural world for ordinary people to coalesce around. I don't know who the next David Attenborough could be. Perhaps one of his final gifts to humanity can be helping to find and establish the profile(s) of natural successor(s) who can carry on his work.
by hammock on 6/15/25, 10:37 PM
I’m confused. We are beyond the point of no return when it comes to global warming. Hasnt he already seen how the story ends?