by codewiz on 6/12/25, 2:33 AM with 25 comments
by gbraad on 6/12/25, 3:15 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga_4000T states the following about the case:
""" The case itself was a re-purposed PC case which is evidenced by the presence of the Turbo button whose function in A4000T was to disable the internal speaker """
https://bigbookofamigahardware.com/bboah/product.aspx?id=31 states:
""" The A4000T from Commodore only saw a limited production of machines (estimated at 100-200) before they went bust in 1994, most machines never made it to the market but ended at third party developers and the local Commodore companies. A recent BBoAH study (2013), indicates that the number machines still existing is VERY low (only a handfull of named owners has been found so far).
In an email from 1996 send from Peter Kittel to a german A4000T user, Peter wrote "that only ~35 Machines got deliverd WORKING to customers, ~35 where NOT working. All in all only ~70 machines left Commodore for customers." That would explain why it is so hard to find somebody owning such a machine. For this reason the Commodore Amiga 4000T is considered the rarest commercial available home computers ever made. """
by neom on 6/12/25, 3:43 AM
by fractallyte on 6/12/25, 4:36 AM
It was an Amiga clone based on the 4000T, omitted some of the Amiga chipset, and was targeted at non-linear video editing.
It was basically a highly specialized machine made for raw power...
by Razengan on 6/12/25, 3:44 AM
Imagine a laptop but with a full-sized keyboard. Doesn't need to be razor thin. More like a portable desktop. Make it wedge-shaped like the Amiga A500 or C64 or Atari ST 520. All the ports. Maybe a detachable display that can fold like a regular laptop clamshell, but optional so you could buy one without a display.
Maybe an operating system that lets you code and create as soon as you take it out of the box and plug it in, and it could be perfect for reintroducing the magic of computers to a new generation.
by CobrastanJorji on 6/12/25, 4:27 AM
Is it possible there was an intended use case where the machine was set to do exactly one thing, which could be safely triggered by anyone with a mouse click event? Or was it simply that mouse clicks without mouse moves were low risk enough to not bother limiting them?
by trembolram on 6/12/25, 3:52 AM
by flohofwoe on 6/12/25, 6:56 AM
Sure, the 4000 models were faster, but the 3000 had the looks (while especially the 4000T looks too much like a boring no-name PC).
by orionblastar on 6/12/25, 2:47 AM