by roschdal on 6/6/25, 5:32 PM with 9 comments
by taylodl on 6/6/25, 5:48 PM
We make the rules. Economics is a game of our making and rules of our choosing.
by throwaway29303 on 6/6/25, 7:21 PM
Suppose the most efficient human produces $250k/y worth of labour and the least efficient model produces $1M/y worth of labour. So $1M - $250k = $750k. %1 of $750k = $7.5k. Now multiply that by the number of companies/people who bought these services.
Models are assumed to a) become more efficient and b) be competent on several and different types of jobs.
This would also include robots but those systems aren't yet ripe, IMO. I'd let them marinate a little further before taxing them.
Apply this tax to very large companies that produce/sell these systems.
[0] - This incentivizes companies to keep investing in more efficient and capable models/systems.
by discoutdynamite on 6/6/25, 10:30 PM
by garbagecoder on 6/6/25, 5:38 PM
by vivito on 6/6/25, 7:49 PM
by theGeatZhopa on 6/6/25, 5:40 PM
.. this might and will lead to a time loop, somehow. In each scenario, AI can't be defeated without much losses. And, not when it fully evolved. We need to stop the development, now!