by panstromek on 5/25/25, 10:29 AM with 6 comments
by d3Xt3r on 5/26/25, 4:43 AM
by jqpabc123 on 5/25/25, 12:52 PM
Linux still lacks 3 really significant "desktop?" features that Windows provides:
1) Standardization --- Which distro and which desktop? Pick one? This would be a no brainer if they were all compatible but they're not. Variety is good? Maybe for a hobbyist, not so much for business.
2) Backward compatibility. The only real constant with Linux is change. Pick any distro/desktop and try running a desktop app from 10 years ago --- if you can find one.
3) Specialized business apps. The reason these are lacking on Linux --- see #1 and #2. It's harder to develop, support and market such apps on Linux. Linux is an inherently hostile ecosystem for a software "market".
With regard to the desktop, business drives Windows, hobbyists drive Linux. Still true after all these years.
by sylware on 5/25/25, 10:53 AM
This is, indeed, a strong signal of an inflexion point.
Simple interface designs which do a good enough job are so much important. But it is so hard to keep them stable in time. There are always lunatics and toxics (whatever their reasons) which will want to extend/break/etc: they abuse the fact that, sometimes, critical mistakes (in the end) will have to be corrected... and to make it short, they see mistakes all-the-time/everywhere for their own agenda.
by theandrewbailey on 5/25/25, 10:57 AM