by MrJagil on 5/22/25, 2:03 PM with 84 comments
by MrJagil on 5/22/25, 2:03 PM
by beau_g on 5/22/25, 4:37 PM
1. Such a device will require significant local compute, generating a lot of heat. It cannot be too close to the body, and require efficient cooling. In the cowboy hat, the processing can be placed above the head in the bucket of the hat, and the cooling dispersed in a large surface area around the brim
2. Such a device requires 360 degree camera vision, thus cannot be a backpack or vest type design (which also bring heat too close to the body). It also must be close to eye level (cannot be shoes).
3. Has to be able to be worn in any environment, with any style. A cowboy hat is great for sun protection, and in the rain.
by duxup on 5/22/25, 2:07 PM
We're all comfortable with phones with all sorts of sensors, but most of those are on or off in a way we understand.
I'm not a fan of the idea that someone else around me brings a device that is perpetually "fully aware of a user’s surroundings and life" around me and then now my privacy is gone ...
by seydor on 5/22/25, 4:32 PM
> will be capable of being fully aware of a user’s surroundings and life, will be unobtrusive, able to rest in one’s pocket or on one’s desk,
Sounds an awful lot like the phone. But it s not a phone. But people forget that a tool with the form factor of a phone has been man's best friend for millenia: it was a knife, a purse, a notebook, and now a phone. They are not going to beat that , is my bet. If it can be integrated in a phone, it's a phone
> a third core device a person would put on their desk after a MacBook Pro and an iPhone.
That's my car keys. now i will have to charge them too?
by whywhywhywhy on 5/22/25, 4:28 PM
shouldn't statements like this be bearish for OpenAI? If what they had internally was so far ahead of everyone else then why would it matter if the physical hardware were cloned, the model would make the difference in the same way the iPhone software and focus on scroll fidelity made it leagues above the LG Prada.
by wnevets on 5/22/25, 4:43 PM
Crazy part is there will be investors who will absolutely believe this. Nothing has shattered the illusion the rich are smarter than everyone else for me than the sagas of madoff, ftx, holmes and now the AI hype.
by baxtr on 5/22/25, 4:54 PM
by neilv on 5/22/25, 6:24 PM
Or build an AI-enabled device that replaces both. All you really need is local sensors, local emitters, and lots of local+remote processing+storage.
The laptop/desktop mostly goes away, when most people won't need desks, since most desk-requiring jobs will soon be done passably by "AI". (Whether the "AI" is actual intelligence, or just robo-plagiarism of training material.) Do you really need a keyboard, when there's nothing for you to type. Do you really need a bunch of screens, when you're not looking at and reasoning about lots of information.
If anyone is going to build a one-device for the idle and disaffected eloi, to be harvested of remaining value, by the weathly, who increasingly consolidate all of the wealth and power, it may well be OpenAI building that device.
Apple isn't the best candidate to nail this, because they have lingering whiffs of hippie counterculture in their self-image. And for a long time, Google thought of themselves as the good ones, with vestiges of that enduring, no matter how much DoubleClick metastasizes. But OpenAI staff was confronted unambiguously with its true self early on, so doesn't have the encumbrances that the others do.
by micromacrofoot on 5/22/25, 4:46 PM
It'll probably be some goofy 180/360 degree camera — phones aren't really designed to be omnipresent so the form factor isn't ideal for the always-on nature of AI they're trying to reach.
by sigmaisaletter on 5/22/25, 5:20 PM
* The second generation will be this opaqueAI ivePad.
* And when the third generation comes out, all phones will already have whatever makes this special.
I don't think Sama and Ive are smarter than everyone else, but even if they are, I don't see how this flies.
by HarHarVeryFunny on 5/22/25, 4:53 PM
The WSJ article says this proposed device can either sit on your desk or go in your pocket, so it's basically either an Alexa in-home device or a bigger pocket-bound Humana pin, or some worse-than-either fits-in-your-pocket compromise.
Not sure what Altman was thinking in paying $6B for an idea that seems bound to fail, unless it is indeed part of a plan to help him cash in on OpenAI, even if that means throwing $6B of stock away.
by deepfriedchokes on 5/22/25, 7:20 PM
I think they’ll fail because they’re discounting how much energy it takes for people to change ecosystems, but it’s a great idea that the big boys will copy.
by fellowniusmonk on 5/22/25, 4:31 PM
the whole pattern of usage for the slab phone medium is based on sucking up as much of our attention as possible.
That and doing anything with bluetooth makes one long for a simple life in the woods.
by DebtDeflation on 5/22/25, 4:34 PM
by ethbr1 on 5/23/25, 12:36 AM
So the plan is to mine personal data from every user and sell it, then?
by amelius on 5/22/25, 4:24 PM
by jsheard on 5/22/25, 4:48 PM
Not sure if he's high on his own supply or just lying through his teeth, but it's one of those. You're going to get value comparable to owning half of Google from acquiring a small hardware design team? Really?
by Isamu on 5/22/25, 4:41 PM
by einrealist on 5/22/25, 4:58 PM
by eabeezxjc on 5/22/25, 4:56 PM
by matthewfelgate on 5/23/25, 9:05 AM
by hbarka on 5/22/25, 4:40 PM
Will we have another moment like this: https://youtu.be/MnrJzXM7a6o
by neilv on 5/22/25, 7:56 PM
Don't forget to upvote when you comment.