by cantaloupe on 5/12/25, 4:11 PM with 33 comments
by boznz on 5/12/25, 7:54 PM
This title problem is even worse as an author where you get one-chance for people to notice/read your book, but if the blurb or the cover picture is even slightly misleading or sub-par to the readers expectation they are likely to review it poorly and then the algorithm kicks it down the listings. I seriously miscategorised my first book and it did not do it any favors.
by tibbar on 5/12/25, 8:19 PM
by billyp-rva on 5/12/25, 7:09 PM
I'm not at all sure it would cause a revolt. Most people probably wouldn't notice at this point.
by turnsout on 5/12/25, 8:52 PM
by MattBearman on 5/12/25, 8:56 PM
by DonHopkins on 5/12/25, 10:10 PM
https://norvig.com/21-days.html
Entitled: "Teach Yourself Programming in Ten Years"!
People who just see then click on the URL must be really disappointed when they read the actual title.
Doesn't hurt that it's a great article, too!
by sam_lowry_ on 5/13/25, 8:13 AM
When I first started moderating titles, users took it personally, so I had to back off manual post-moderation and built a dozen pre-moderation filters that forced people to write proper titles. I blocked long sequences of uppercase letters, obscenities, too short and too long titles, duplicate postings, greetings, improper use of punctuation, series of exclamation and question marks and god knows what. It worked, but it drove away some users.
A few years later, I relaxed the pre-moderation filters and reintroduced post-moderation. This time, I sent automatic notifications to users as titles of their posts changed. I kept receiving complaints, I so I developed a few tricks that would reduce the number of complaints. Instead of rewriting a title, I took user text that represented the essence of the post and put it as the title, keeping the original spelling and even case, so that the user clearly sees that the titles comes from his own post.
Later on, I joined a media company and observed editors rewriting titles of journalists, detecting patterns in the changes. I followed Huffington Post’s research on A/B testing of titles and read blogs of their admirers. I even did some A/B testing on titles myself.
At some point, I even shook the dust off my machine learning skills and searched for correlations between titles and the votes on comments below.
It’s been a few years since I adopted a new approach to title moderation.
I removed titles. Entirely.
Users are presented with a generously sized textarea to write their post or comment, and the title is generated from the first few words of it. There was a bit of magic first, like skipping the greeting, but I ended up removing almost all of it. New users are confused by the apparent lack of title, but this only forces them to think through the text. Oldtimers know exactly what to expect in the title and adapt accordingly.
by paulpauper on 5/12/25, 8:40 PM
by andy99 on 5/12/25, 8:25 PM
by eCa on 5/12/25, 8:41 PM
Personally, I would care (much) more about making a good thing over doing something many people likes.
by cosmicgadget on 5/12/25, 8:29 PM
For better or worse, my process is:
1. Write something
2. Create a title that is sometimes literal or sometimes a theme if the post covers multiple topics (I know, I know)
3. Rely on a one-sentence rss/html description to provide a clear preview of the content
by mac-attack on 5/12/25, 6:53 PM
by amw-zero on 5/12/25, 7:25 PM
by AlienRobot on 5/12/25, 8:31 PM