by TimCTRL on 4/30/25, 11:03 PM with 18 comments
by elpool2 on 4/30/25, 11:49 PM
Yikes. I really thought Apple was going to get away with all their crazy restrictions they came up with after the previous ruling (and maybe they still will, who knows) but this looks pretty bad for them.
by lordleft on 4/30/25, 11:06 PM
At the very least, not allowing apps to MENTION the fact that you can purchase items outside an app is ridiculously anti-competitive.
The truth is that we would never accept this behavior on a traditional desktop OS, but we've tolerated it in the context of iOS. I think that's arbitrary and I hope this ruling sticks.
by mil22 on 5/1/25, 12:05 AM
by amluto on 5/1/25, 3:10 AM
by afavour on 4/30/25, 11:26 PM
> The judge also referred the case to the US attorney to review it for possible criminal contempt proceedings.
Of course in the current climate who knows if anything will end up happening but all the same: good. It’s about time we started to see consequences for blatantly deliberate misinterpretation of court rulings.
by ChrisArchitect on 5/1/25, 2:59 AM
by chipgap98 on 5/1/25, 12:02 AM
by nojvek on 5/1/25, 10:04 AM
This is worth Billions to Apple. Perhaps more when the stock tanks due to the ruling.
by curiousWaste on 4/30/25, 11:13 PM