by kvee on 3/14/25, 7:30 PM with 45 comments
by nostromo on 3/14/25, 8:04 PM
This is incredibly sad.
by nis0s on 3/14/25, 8:28 PM
Note that genetic testing or evidence will be insufficient for proving the type of claim this paper is making because there are too many confounding factors which override biological similarities—that’s the whole issue with nature vs. nurture.
by zasz on 3/14/25, 8:32 PM
This person could've spent a lot less time going down a rabbit hole with a couple introductory anthropology classes and by asking themselves if there were any societies with these same traits in a warm climate. It is poor scientific reasoning not to check for examples of this personality type in hot climates. Not exactly PhD material.
by pavel_lishin on 3/14/25, 8:21 PM
Cause it in individuals? Or select for it through evolution?
If the former, there's no genetic component here, and the effect should vanish as soon as you get somewhere warm.
If it's the latter, then it can't cause it in individuals who happen to work there over local-winter, right?
by fliglr on 3/14/25, 8:50 PM
>West African populations have up to 19% "Ghost DNA", belonging to an extinct species their ancestors interbred with
>Southeast Asians have DNA of the extinct Denisovan species, as much as 3-5% in the aboriginal people of Papua New Guinea, Australia, the Philippines
>These aboriginals also have DNA belonging to a now extinct, but not yet discovered hominid species
I'm sure the implications of all these findings have not yet been discovered but it's exciting to see them explored
by bondarchuk on 3/14/25, 8:13 PM
by kelvinjps10 on 3/14/25, 8:30 PM
by ChrisArchitect on 3/14/25, 8:33 PM
by nobodyandproud on 3/16/25, 5:13 PM
The author did themselves a disservice by not filtering some of the bitterness of their journey, because the opening story was fascinating and hints at something worth exploring.
The constructive criticism would be better served as a follow-up post.
by paulluuk on 3/14/25, 8:22 PM
However, the anti-"woke" part of this article seems so odd to me. Given all the wacky "science" from Nazi scientists that "research" differences between races leading to genocide, it seems completely logical to me that you jump through several hoops and make sure your research is really sound before you publish a paper that explores exactly that topic.