by aestetix on 3/10/25, 7:49 AM with 29 comments
by andrewinardeer on 3/10/25, 10:46 AM
2600 Magazine says they didn't. They posted names and email addresses of DOGE employees.
My partner works for the government in a mid level management position. I'd be pissed if someone on X posted her name and email address in an article that borderline encouraged people to email her in a not so positive manner.
It seems that X deems names and email addresses to be personal info. I'm pretty sure this was in Twitters ToS pre-Musk as well.
Why does breaking X's ToS not warrant an account suspension? You can even sneeze loudly in some subreddits without falling afoul of inciting violence.
Perhaps this is a shift away from cancel culture? I don't see why that's a bad thing.
by DrWhax on 3/10/25, 12:11 PM
by x______________ on 3/10/25, 11:43 AM
The topic at hand seems a stretch compared to normal content from the 2600 crew and the background they come from, doxxing (anyone) (for whatever reason) on a social media account (irregardless of who runs it) doesn't seem like a good idea.
by zfg on 3/10/25, 8:23 AM