by e12e on 2/27/25, 6:28 PM with 9 comments
by TomK32 on 2/28/25, 7:11 AM
Source: https://youtu.be/zDUNnfXvzcg?t=2195 at about 36:35
by techorange on 2/27/25, 6:45 PM
This may be one of those projects I’m ok with a little over time and over budget.
by boznz on 2/27/25, 7:04 PM
All systems should be subject to scrutiny especially ones that control the lives of people, if it has faults, then they should be addressed, if it is not fit for purpose it should be replaced with a completely open tender process and adequate timelines.
I know a lot of software guru's who see the ATC system as a smaller problem than harder probelms such as self-driving, as there is less traffic and aircraft work in 3D space but there are many edge case scenario's in every complex system, a ten minute brief for an X soundbyte is not going to uncover them, but a thorough analysis by a tight team of specialists might.
I have no skin in this game but when I'm at 30000 feet flying at 500MPH, I would like to think these systems are getting scutinised.
by pmdulaney on 2/27/25, 10:30 PM
by ZeroGravitas on 2/27/25, 7:00 PM
> And the first thing that some experts told me when this happened is you can’t hook up land to satellites, and you can’t hook up satellites to land. It doesn’t work. And we spent billions and billions of dollars trying to renovate an old, broken system, instead of just saying, “Cut it loose, and let’s spend less money and build a great system.” Done by two or three companies — very s- — good companies, specialists. That’s all it is.
Sounds like Musk's first thought was "How can I profit from these tragic deaths?"
by actionfromafar on 2/27/25, 6:41 PM
by duxup on 2/27/25, 6:40 PM
by AnimalMuppet on 2/27/25, 6:43 PM
/s
This looks like Musk is finding ways to leverage his position into huge amounts of new business for his companies. That is, it looks a lot like graft.