by spzb on 2/22/25, 2:29 PM with 106 comments
by neebz on 2/26/25, 11:03 AM
At that time angelfire.com used to give free webspace. My brother got hold of a pirated version of CorelDraw and setup a fan website of his favorite rock band Junoon, which incidentally is still online: https://www.angelfire.com/pa/JUNOON
And then when my brother met the band at a concert and they actually recognized him due to the website. I guess first time we realized how impactful internet is going to be.
by aosaigh on 2/26/25, 12:05 PM
by Angostura on 2/26/25, 9:35 AM
It used to make it really easy to have a cool little website. I used mine for a simple blog - now gone.
by adzm on 2/26/25, 10:21 AM
by FreesiaGaul on 2/26/25, 9:35 AM
Of course I'm not amazing, but frontend should feel like art, because that's what it is.
by ksec on 2/22/25, 2:45 PM
by bix6 on 2/26/25, 9:25 AM
by rchaud on 2/26/25, 3:38 PM
1. Most of the Old Web site experiences were one-and-done. We checked out a website, then checked out the next one on the webring or Geocities neighborhood. Unless the site "looked" like it was updated with news, we generally didn't re-visit the site, or really even remember it. Your old website could feel just as disposable and stale as the average social media post.
2. RSS and algo-free chronological feeds won't return us to a time of civility. I have never stopped using RSS. But the system isn't designed to support a feed where 10% of the sites post 90% of the content. The experience is awful, there is no way to order things so as to see a diversified feed. RSS of course also flattens web pages into a lifeless scroll of text, defeating the purpose of home-made web pages.
3. Webdev is too complicated now compared to a time when your ISP gave you an FTP folder and Notepad was all that was needed to write some HTML and display some images. Modern webdev (code editor, SSL, hosting, mobile-ready CSS) creates an adverse selection problem where the people with the time and skill to make websites, already do so in their work and thus create the most boring websites imaginable....code-heavy tech blogs or wispy 'digital transformation' thought leadership.
by tiniuclx on 2/26/25, 1:23 PM
The best part by far is people going out of their way to get in touch & let me know that the found a post of mine interesting or useful.
by ChrisArchitect on 2/26/25, 12:48 PM
by fjallstrom on 2/26/25, 1:39 PM
by scotty79 on 2/26/25, 1:13 PM
Any attempt to bring back home pages must essentially include a way to discover them. Search engines has been dead for that purpose for more than a decade.
If you want to give back autonomy to publishers, your solution must also grant the same autonomy to commenters. You need to enable all people to control their content, whether they are original posters or pre-posters and commenters.
by reitoei on 2/26/25, 2:16 PM
by hsnice16 on 2/26/25, 1:41 PM
I am working on this - https://personal-logs.vercel.app/anime
by dmilicic on 2/26/25, 10:12 AM
The spirit of doing what you want is exactly what inspired me to do it, it's not the best nor the fastest web but it doesn't matter, I simply wanted to do it in a different way (Flutter & WASM).
by laurentlb on 2/26/25, 9:57 AM
The garden theme made me smile. Now, I'm considering redesigning my website.
I removed the links from my website a decade ago, but I enjoyed looking at the section on the page. Not sure what I'll do about it.
by lawlesst on 2/27/25, 1:53 PM
by listenfaster on 2/26/25, 2:46 PM
by mojuba on 2/26/25, 8:20 AM
The web went the way it went because ultimately centralization wins both in terms economics and discoverability. You host your blog (or rather "blog") on Facebook for free and get a chance to be discovered by strangers, for better or worse.
Not saying it's necessarily a good thing, because now you are at a mercy of corporate censorship that isn't even required to abide by the users' constitutional rights and freedoms. They can limit your speech in any way they like and it's what they do: their platform, their rules.
On the other hand, without centralization the web is expensive and not very discoverable. Your standalone web site is like a cactus in the middle of a vast desert nobody cares about, in fact now at a mercy of Google's indexing policies.
There is no bottom line here. It's all about economy and capitalism, which seem to always win.
by santoshalper on 2/26/25, 1:24 PM