by paulgb on 2/16/25, 9:18 PM with 19 comments
by noodlesUK on 2/16/25, 10:23 PM
I don’t work in the field, but I have visited ECMWF and they’re the real deal.
https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/open-data
https://www.met.no/en/free-meteorological-data/Data-and-prod...
by Grosvenor on 2/16/25, 9:27 PM
Why should the government give that out to the paying public, when one of trumps friends could make a buck selling it to you?
The next obvious step is to dismantle NOAA altogether, because that could be provided by the private market.
by Jimmc414 on 2/16/25, 9:50 PM
by jfengel on 2/16/25, 10:22 PM
It's not really possible to get a meaningful answer to that question. Even if I accepted that an answer was honest I'm not sure I could accept it as accurate. Counterfactuals always have an element of "all things being equal" but things are never equal.
Still... You can see why I think they'd be calling for treason trials. And so I'm not sure what they expect me to be doing at this moment.
by paulgb on 2/16/25, 9:19 PM
by strangattractor on 2/16/25, 10:28 PM
by oriettaxx on 2/17/25, 1:07 AM
but I don't get it: why was it removed?