by vegetablepotpie on 1/26/25, 2:14 PM with 31 comments
by k310 on 1/26/25, 3:39 PM
For whatever reason, it hurts like hell.
by ZeroGravitas on 1/26/25, 7:26 PM
"No blackouts or cost increases due to 100 % clean, renewable electricity powering California for parts of 98 days"
> This paper uses data from the world's 5th-largest economy to show no blackouts occurred when wind-water-solar electricity supply exceeded 100 % of demand on California's main grid for a record 98 of 116 days from late winter to early summer, 2024, for an average of 4.84 (and maximum 10.1) hours/day
by phillipseamore on 1/26/25, 3:10 PM
Also "peaked at 83.2 % of daily demand on May 25."
Note that demand in 2023 was 533.6 Gwh/day and went down to 529.1.
"between June 2023 and June 2024, nameplate capacities of utility solar, wind, and batteries increased by ∼18%, ∼4%, and 73.3%, respectively"
Cost and details of those capacity increases isn't mentioned but it seems that the average 31.7% increase in capacity only yielded a 5.2pp increase (mostly from the batteries which appear to handle 4 hours of load).
The study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014812...
by mistrial9 on 1/26/25, 4:42 PM
source: local news reporter Kevin Truong
by bell-cot on 1/26/25, 2:39 PM
Nice...but "up to 10" < 24, and 98 < 116, and "how easy was the first 1/4?" is generally a crap indicator of how easily a job can be finished.
by cma on 1/26/25, 4:10 PM
> The state went a record 98 of 116 days providing up to 10 hours
Does the study clarify? "Up to” could mean almost anything, and could be rewritten ”no more than"
by throwaway5292 on 1/26/25, 2:26 PM