by SirLJ on 1/22/25, 10:00 PM with 11 comments
by Animats on 1/22/25, 10:41 PM
That's privately owned, and currently for sale. Great location, south of the Richmond Bridge. It's a 5 acre big steep-sided rock sticking out of deep water. Nobody has ever been willing to spend enough money to do anything with it. Even conservation groups don't want it.
The price has gone from $49,000 in 1954 to an asking price of $25 million now. No takers.
by Reasoning on 1/23/25, 12:11 AM
This seems to be the crux of the issue. If what Sweeney is saying is true here it's hard not to be sympathetic to him being caught in a sort of Kafkaesque trap. It seems common sense that you'd be able to repair levees on the island you bought.
The artificial wetlands being built in the Netherlands come to mind too.
by uqual on 1/23/25, 12:56 AM
https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/san-francisco-island-ow...
by dgfitz on 1/22/25, 10:33 PM
I guess that tracks, given the url.
by lupusreal on 1/22/25, 10:35 PM
by Molitor5901 on 1/22/25, 10:23 PM