by grandimam on 12/22/24, 6:34 PM with 5 comments
by thesuperbigfrog on 12/22/24, 6:55 PM
Inertia.
It takes a lot of time, effort, money, and consensus to replace the current status quo with something else.
Unless there is a significant motivation to change things will stay the same or slowly evolve as all things do in tech.
Similar examples that are somewhat debatable are:
Arm-based processors over x86-based processors
Rust over C / C++
Electric vehicles over internal combustion vehicles
Et cetera . . .
The existence of alternatives is not enough to displace the status quo.
What alternative to the current web ecosystem are you envisioning? Pure WASM? Something else?
by solardev on 12/23/24, 2:41 PM
Apple doesn't really care about the web as much as its native apps and is usually very slow to implement any new web features. They don't want the web to win because that means they lose 30% app store revenue.
Google is too lost and leaderless to take big risks. They want to just keep milking the ad dollars as long as they can. Chrome changes are more about increasing ad revenue (eg manifest V3) than making the stack better.
Neither company is incentivized to make the web better.
Microsoft tried many times (activeX, asp, .net, clickonce, etc.) and failed because people don't trust them with their "embrace extend extinguish" history.
Firefox is a has-been rounding error at this point.
There's nobody else to champion a better web and break the network effect stranglehold of Chrome and Safari. The only major innovation we see in the web space are from Cloudflare and Vercel, but they work on and around the existing web stack rather than reinventing it altogether.
by theandrewbailey on 12/22/24, 7:23 PM
by wmf on 12/22/24, 9:04 PM