by Jun8 on 12/21/24, 11:57 PM with 106 comments
by uxhacker on 12/22/24, 8:11 AM
by whakim on 12/22/24, 7:53 AM
by kazinator on 12/22/24, 5:57 AM
Sure, but it's a reflection of a large amount of human intelligence, from many individualks, almost instantly available (in a certain form) to one individual.
by Vecr on 12/22/24, 7:11 AM
There are interesting ways to argue for humans being special, but I read the entire article and unless I missed something important there's nothing like that there.
by mebutnotme on 12/22/24, 7:43 AM
At present I don’t think it is yet at the same point but when the AI can adjust those pathways, add more in compute time (infinite memory like tech) and is allowed to ‘think’ about those pathways then I can see it gaining our level or better of philosophical thought.
by jeisc on 12/23/24, 8:10 AM
by scotty79 on 12/22/24, 7:09 AM
by kaielvin on 12/22/24, 8:25 AM
by silisili on 12/22/24, 8:55 AM
Yeah, gonna need proof on that one.
First, LLM slop is uncannily easy to pick out in comments vs human thought.
Second, there's no prompt that you can give a human that will generate absolutely nonsense response or canceling the request.
If anything, it feels like it doesn't actually understand language at all, and just craps out what it thinks looks like a language. Which is exactly what it does, in fact, sometimes to fanfare.
by tzury on 12/22/24, 6:41 AM
This is my opinion, my view and how I set my life to embrace it and immerse into it.
I actually wrote a piece about it a day ago.
https://blog.tarab.ai/p/evolution-mi-and-the-forgotten-human
Sorry for the “self promotion”, but it’s a direct relation to the topic.