from Hacker News

Companies are firing Gen Z employees soon after hiring them

by makerdiety on 12/15/24, 6:46 PM with 5 comments

  • by orf on 12/15/24, 9:25 PM

    > According to the survey that was conducted by ResumeTemplates and which included responses from nearly 1,500 young job seekers…

    > Another 25 per cent even brought their parents to interviews

    So this is obviously completely trash data and all conclusions drawn from it are suspect, or the article is written by an idiot.

    How does “1/4 interviewees brought their parents to interviews” pass the smell test?

    It must mean assistance with travel, but regardless of the fault lying with the author or the data, it doesn’t bode well for the conclusions.

  • by eesmith on 12/15/24, 7:31 PM

    > Gen Z's focus on extracurricular activities to boost their college competitiveness rather than gaining job experience has led to "unrealistic expectations" about the workplace and how to deal with their bosses.

    ROFL! Students did all the things companies said were the right things to get hired, and now the companies are complaining about the result. And they want to blame the students?

    The last 40 years companies have said that they need more college-educated people - that is, young adults need go into massive debt to train themselves for a career, rather than having the company pay for on-the-job training.

    So they did that, which means out-competing all the other students who want to get into the upper-level schools which companies want to hire from.

    Of course that means they don't have job experience. If companies want people with job experience, they need to pay real wages for internships and apprentices.

    > Around six in ten companies included in the survey reported firing a recent university graduate they hired this year.

    Did I read that right that if they hired 100 people and fired one, that would be included in this statistic.

    > also reported that some of their Gen Z workers struggled to manage their workload, were frequently late, and did not dress or speak appropriately

    Umm, they made the same comments about Gen X workers.

  • by exabrial on 12/16/24, 2:43 AM

    Speaking in generalities below, as we have found a few diamonds in the rough we’re happy to have.

    All of the issues we’ve seen in the article, painfully.

    The other one not mentioned is the assumption they have the same privileges as someone that has ‘put in the time’ and ‘everything has to be fair’. In general the concepts of sweat equity/rank are foreign, and many overestimate their usefulness to the org relative to their demands; without so much first mastering basic skills like writing, verbal communication, receiving critical feedback, or even punctuality.

    It’s unproductive to rip on another generation. So as an experiment, we’re putting a few through a *8th grade level* English crash course, followed by a technical writing class. Our take is that millennials weren’t wholly prepared either, and the previous generations had the mindfulness to give us a hand.

  • by Havoc on 12/16/24, 2:18 AM

    They certainly come at issues from a novel angle.

    Had one interviewee that was entirely focused on the DEI committee. No real interest in the role. Also, tiny company so there is no freakin DEI committee. Didn’t get hired.