by ivanvanderbyl on 11/11/24, 6:42 PM with 8 comments
by phrenq on 11/11/24, 6:58 PM
That’s not to say it would make the internet better. What’s good for the internet and what makes a lot of money are often at odds, and the latter usually wins.
by dtagames on 11/11/24, 7:07 PM
The winner here is the platforms who push surveillance advertising models. It's not better for advertisers and definitely not for users and LLM-based content will not help one bit.
by ro_bit on 11/11/24, 8:59 PM
It’s hard to embrace the hype of this “opportunity” when the end goal seems downright horrific for society
by Doctor-R on 11/11/24, 7:07 PM
Currently, consumers are totally bombarded with ads, on TV, on streaming, on social media, on websites. There are multiple copies of the same ad during an hour time slot. Consumers go from slight interest, to irritation, to disgust, to nauseated.
Currently, the algorithms that target ads are complete failure. At least, they could get my gender right.
The next big advance in AI is going to be ad blockers for social media, streaming video, live television. Then the next step will be bots that respond to ads, with total click through rate and messages directly to the CEO of the company. Imagine an App that calls the CEO and replays the audio of their video ad. Or an App that DM's the CEO for every social media ad. The CEO bothered a million people, let the million respond directly to the CEO.
by inhumantsar on 11/11/24, 6:51 PM
1. "trust me bro" numbers are meaningless 2. nothing would push me off the internet faster than AI marketers that act like they know me
by spamdotlol on 11/11/24, 6:47 PM