by Gabriel54 on 10/10/24, 2:32 AM with 52 comments
by Animats on 10/10/24, 5:27 AM
Motor Trend: "America's vehicles are fat, and its guardrails suck."[2] Motor Trend is critical of the U.Texas tests, because they didn't test larger gas-powered trucks. The current guardrail test weight for pickup trucks is 5000 pounds. That was increased from 4500 pounds in 2019. Current Ford F-150 trucks can be over 7,000 pounds, empty. The Rivian EV pickup is listed as 7,148 lbs. The Hummer EV is over 9000 lbs.
Guardrails have ratings - TL1 through TL6. TL3 is most common. That's the 5000 pound pickup truck level. The standard test is not straight-on; it's 45 degrees. After all, these things are alongside roads, and are rarely hit straight on at high speed.
The last big problem with guardrails was collisions with guardrail ends, especially at freeway offramps. There are good solutions for that in place now. Take a good look at the high-traffic Interstate offramp you see. There are various different crushable systems used, and they work reasonably well. The main problem is replacing them after use. They're a consumable.
Low center of gravity is a big problem. Guardrail heights have been increased over the last few decades as cars got bigger. Low-CG electrics push their way under. Notice, though, that the Tesla test resulted in the vehicle traveling parallel to the guardrail after the vehicle went under it. Enough energy was absorbed to redirect the vehicle. The Rivian went clear through.
Maybe for pickups above some weight drivers should have to have a commercial driver's license, the one you need to drive a real truck.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6CKltZfToY
[2] https://www.motortrend.com/news/guardrail-safety-study-evs-p...
by bryanlarsen on 10/10/24, 4:16 AM
For example, a Tesla 3 is within 5% of the weight of a BMW 3.
by wenc on 10/10/24, 3:00 AM
by esjeon on 10/10/24, 3:11 AM
Also, this experiment also means that BEVs can inflict bigger damages to other hard objects (e.g. buildings), and drivers would get injured more seriously during collision. So I think we should get a safer design that kills the kinetic energy on collision.
by breakyerself on 10/10/24, 3:06 AM
by kmoser on 10/10/24, 3:11 AM
by MBCook on 10/10/24, 3:29 AM
by helsinkiandrew on 10/10/24, 4:12 AM
by jader201 on 10/10/24, 3:06 AM
Granted, it’s ideal if they can withstand that angle of impact, but I’m trying to understand the real world impact to safety this has.
by diebeforei485 on 10/10/24, 6:39 PM
by yieldcrv on 10/10/24, 2:56 AM
by ekianjo on 10/10/24, 3:12 AM
by userbinator on 10/10/24, 3:06 AM
...which isn't much on the absolute scale; the difference in weight between a small sedan and a larger one, or an SUV or truck. If EVs weren't being stopped by guardrails, neither were the latter.
by erikaww on 10/10/24, 3:02 AM
by 01HNNWZ0MV43FF on 10/10/24, 3:00 AM
> It’s not only the weight of the vehicle, TTI said. The battery used to power EVs creates a lower center of gravity and the front is a storage space instead of an engine compartment.
by wg0 on 10/10/24, 3:16 AM
Average Joe concerned with commute isn't buying them. They aren't doing good at car rentals even. Hertz comes to mind.
Mr. Musk must be given credit that he created such a FOMO that whole car industry went into panic and started building assembly lines.