by glitcher on 9/29/24, 3:38 PM with 153 comments
by myprotegeai on 9/29/24, 5:59 PM
Creeps me the fuck out, and the owners seem to have no ethical qualms about buying, selling, and using this data.
by agentultra on 9/29/24, 5:33 PM
Other notable examples: the EPA. There was a time when people had to wear gas masks out doors in some cities because the pollution was so bad before regulations and enforcement came into place. Similar stories with CFC emissions.
The development of the Internet has been accelerated under mostly conservative leadership which has been walking back regulations. And while much innovation has happened in that time I think a great deal more could have been achieved if it weren’t focused on this kind of profit-at-all-costs environment it’s been simmering in.
by glitcher on 9/29/24, 3:40 PM
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/09/...
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Social-Media-6b...
Edit: added link to pdf
by mrbluecoat on 9/29/24, 5:01 PM
by fromMars on 9/29/24, 10:06 PM
by motohagiography on 9/29/24, 7:45 PM
a real solution would be to legally privilege and disqualify classes of personal information from civil and non-violent criminal legal proceedings based on how they were collected, and PII collection sources material to commercial decisions must be disclosed in offers and contracts.
insurers and creditors would actually have to take risk again instead of being rentiers, police are servants and not governors, and the provenance of PII as evidence would have to be proven as from a legal and prescribed source that included explicit consent. there is no stopping the flow of data collection, but we can improve laws to manage it.
by kristjank on 9/29/24, 9:25 PM
by t0bia_s on 9/29/24, 9:08 PM
Let's not play game to makes states good guys and companies the bad boys.
by oglop on 9/30/24, 3:25 PM
Also, you don’t own your data. That idea is itself an absurdity that is already meaningless. Once that is accepted life becomes much simpler. You want stock growth and tech jobs, that’s part of the deal. I didn’t make it and I’m not responsible for it but that’s how it is.
by tsunamifury on 9/29/24, 6:31 PM
by 29athrowaway on 9/29/24, 6:26 PM
by lyu07282 on 9/30/24, 10:42 AM
by OneLeggedCat on 9/29/24, 5:48 PM
Why wouldn't they? A capitalist shareholder system requires that they do exactly this, to whatever extent it does not impact sales.
It's on citizens to demand regulation, and yet in the US, a probable majority of voting citizens don't like regulation, and think that government is too large or too untrustworthy. Combine that with the control that corporations have over our politicians, and further combine that with low public understanding of the issue, and there is nothing realistic that can be done.
So I consider surveillance capitalism to be permanent in the US. Regardless of the fact that most people don't like being spied on and manipulated constantly. Perhaps some really large, really bad event could galvanize the public, but I doubt it.
by sanchezxa on 9/29/24, 7:15 PM
by OutOfHere on 9/29/24, 5:51 PM