by gok on 9/18/24, 11:38 PM with 88 comments
by Karupan on 9/19/24, 1:59 AM
Cool, new strategy?!
> Through our voluntary early retirement and separation offerings, we are more than halfway to our workforce reduction target of approximately 15,000 by the end of the year. We still have difficult decisions to make and will notify impacted employees in the middle of October.
Oh right.
by htrp on 9/19/24, 2:03 AM
But we'll still want everyone back in office in Q1 25
by cameldrv on 9/19/24, 2:11 AM
by jordanb on 9/19/24, 1:52 AM
When did our corporate leadership become so dumb and predictable?
by jauntywundrkind on 9/19/24, 3:11 AM
I am a little curious to see where Intel goes with data-center chips. They have been expensive and hot, and the many-small-core offerings at least finds efficiency again. Otherwise it's less clear to me what coming up has promise, and gee, it sure seems like Nvidia and AMD both are super focused on that massive data center market.
One thing that was super interesting in this message was what Amazon want's Intel's 18A for. It's not a CPU, they want it for AI fabric? Interesting seeing the switches be the highest demand. Switch chips are normally quite big, yes? Given how much likelier defects are as size increases, that's going to be a hard test - where-as AMD for example has lots of small CCD's it can stack on a interposer. But also Intel has some fantastic advanced packaging that maybe makes them an ideal partner here - maybe EIMB bridges to PHY or on-package optics stuff, what's grown up from integrated Omni-Path (although not Omni-Path itself, that got sold off already). https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/intel-...
by nxobject on 9/19/24, 2:34 AM
- Intel’s divesting from Altera;
- Intel seems to be eschewing the consumer device/computer market for more B2B custom collaborations, e.g. with AWS and hinted later on.
A lot of retrenchment from Intel. Once Foundry’s no longer embarrassing to Intel, though, what’s their plan for anticipating the future?
by SlightlyLeftPad on 9/19/24, 1:29 AM
by light_hue_1 on 9/19/24, 3:38 AM
I had a lot of hope that Pat Gelsinger being an engineer would lead Intel to a revival. But this is total delusion. Intel isn't even a remote player in AI.
If they can't admit the dire situation that Intel is in, having missed the AI boat almost entirely and even managed to fall behind Apple somehow, they aren't going to find a way back.
They have nothing to offer over Nvidia for AI. They have nothing to offer over TSMC when it comes to their fab aside from being a US based alternative (and taking billions from taxpayers). x86 has nothing new to offer; their insane moves with AVX have fragmented the platform terribly. It's not even easy to ship high performance x86 code these days.
Looks like all this is, is an announcement that they're going to fire a lot of people soon to make their financials look good while the ship continues to sink.
by scovetta on 9/19/24, 8:02 AM
When you have difficult news to share, get it out first. Be direct and authentic. Say you're sorry, that you messed up (hint: if you are the CEO, every success is partially yours and every failure is partially yours).
by Bluebirt on 9/19/24, 6:10 AM
by arder on 9/19/24, 1:31 PM
by ChrisArchitect on 9/19/24, 3:28 AM
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41562481
by MegaDeKay on 9/19/24, 3:04 AM
by ilyagr on 9/19/24, 2:38 AM
If they do, can they compete with Intel's for US govt grants, or has that ship sailed now that Intel got a grant?
If not, is there room for meaningful innovation in x86 chip design?
How about TSMC? Do they now have a monopoly on state-of-the-art chip fabrication?
by limpbizkitfan on 9/19/24, 3:38 PM
Intel has all the opportunity to innovate and they choose not to.
by arenaninja on 9/19/24, 2:58 AM
by reliabilityguy on 9/19/24, 1:58 AM
by pharos92 on 9/19/24, 11:46 AM