by marc__1 on 9/17/24, 7:18 PM with 89 comments
by fsckboy on 9/17/24, 7:49 PM
so, we're talking about at a very zoomed out level, but the gene responsible is already "implicated" in human neurodevelopmental conditions in the cerebellum.
by squigz on 9/17/24, 10:19 PM
There's a lot of important discussion when this sort of topic comes up. I agree that this might be a slippery slope if applied incorrectly, but that isn't a good reason not to conduct the research. I also don't ever see anyone applying that slippery slope argument to, say, blindness research.
Anyway, what's more important to me is that there's always suggestions that autism isn't something that needs to be cured, because all we need is for society to be more accepting of us, and we'll be okay.
That's really only part of the picture. Autism affects every moment of our lives, not just when we're interacting with society. How will society being more accepting stop my sensory overload issues? Or help my executive disfunction, so I can properly take care of myself? How will it help our difficulties connecting with people, even when those people are already accepting and patient with us?
I have to wonder where people who suggest these things fall on the spectrum, to think that the problems living with autism are so limited.
by rzmmm on 9/18/24, 7:30 AM
by olliej on 9/18/24, 1:28 AM
2) autism like traits
3) plenty of other cases of “knock out one gene” lead to everything from allergies to neurological problems, to missing limbs and organs. It should not be surprising that someone could find a gene that caused neurological issues, that look similar to autism when you lack all the methods for distinguishing autism from any other neurological disorder.
by mass_and_energy on 9/17/24, 8:41 PM
by kulahan on 9/17/24, 7:40 PM
by BurningFrog on 9/17/24, 7:46 PM