by cglong on 9/12/24, 7:31 PM with 22 comments
by zb3 on 9/12/24, 9:58 PM
Things will get even worse because Google is working on the AVF framework which includes so called "protected VMs" - of course they're meant to be protected from you, the user. Their "security" (where you're the "attacker") is based on the TEE but also a so called "protected vm firmware". In their design document they explicitly say that these protected VMs can provide "security" only with locked bootloader.. you probably know what that means..
by hollow-moe on 9/12/24, 9:29 PM
by Boltgolt on 9/12/24, 9:04 PM
by zb3 on 9/12/24, 9:44 PM
However, Google is developing a new obfuscation method called pairip (officially automatic integrity protection) that makes it really hard to patch apps by moving some java code to an encrypted vm riddled with checksums and anti debugging checks.. Fortunately "really hard" (and yes, the vm is crazy..) doesn't mean impossible.
But for server side services, this will unfortunately serve its purpose.
by ChrisArchitect on 9/13/24, 2:46 AM
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41515588
by dartharva on 9/12/24, 8:15 PM