by deegles on 9/4/24, 8:42 PM with 37 comments
by twojacobtwo on 9/7/24, 9:19 PM
>6PPD helps by reacting with ozone before it can react with the tire rubber, sparing the tires.
>But when 6PPD reacts with ozone, the researchers found that it was transformed into multiple chemicals, including 6PPD-quinone (pronounced “kwih-known”), the toxic chemical that is responsible for killing the salmon.
by cyberax on 9/8/24, 12:42 AM
However, replacing 6PPD with a different anti-oxidant is a no-brainer. There are plenty of other alternatives, and this time the industry is making sure to pick something that won't be toxic to some form of bumblebee after exposure to nitrogen oxides.
There's a report with the list of best alternatives so far: https://www.ustires.org/largest-global-tire-industry-consort...
by aaronbrethorst on 9/7/24, 9:16 PM
[2020]
I was confused to see this pop up now as this feels like common knowledge in Seattle, but the 2020 date on the article definitely clarifies that.by clumsysmurf on 9/7/24, 10:20 PM
I live in Phoenix, and when I go out at night with a good flashlight, the amount of stuff in the air, visible in the beam, is crazy. I imagine some is dirt among other things, but wonder if the micropastics of the tires are airborne as well.
Since it hardly ever rains here it probably just accumulates on the roads and gets kicked up with activity.
by mattgrice on 9/8/24, 1:52 AM
by at_a_remove on 9/8/24, 1:39 AM
While I love science as much as anyone else does, I am wondering if a distant human future civilization (assuming we have one), will have switched to a "this new molecule is by default dangerous until proven otherwise, over decades." Chemical engineering would grind to a halt, but might perhaps be replaced by ever-finer mechanical processes for similar results.
by ExMachina73 on 9/7/24, 11:48 PM
by carapace on 9/7/24, 10:28 PM
Cars -> tire dust -> dead salmon -> reduced phosphorous -> sick forest
by 1-6 on 9/7/24, 10:42 PM
by matt123456789 on 9/7/24, 9:18 PM
by xyst on 9/8/24, 2:18 AM