by TheAnkurTyagi on 8/12/24, 11:36 AM with 47 comments
by ko_pivot on 8/13/24, 11:24 PM
by roberttod on 8/13/24, 11:58 PM
I was under the impression for quite some time that it wasn't that bad to have 2-3ms latencies compared to a co-located DB which is typically <1ms. However, we recently switched from Neon to a colocated, managed db and there was a huge improvement. Some of our queries were executing sequentially (due to our ORM, Prisma), and so what was a 3 second transaction was reduced to only 1 second. Yes this could be rearchitected better, but it illustrates a major floor in my mind for these companies providing only a DB.
Managed vs. unmanaged is a massive difference and would be worth it. But these days I was under the impression most hosting companies also offer managed DBs.
by eashish93 on 8/14/24, 6:21 AM
by re-thc on 8/13/24, 11:34 PM
If it's AWS hosted for example it can range from a t2 (low end) to c7a (high end) and have huge performance impacts. How will this change over time?
It's weird that pricing is based on CPU but it's never defined. And how do we compare between offerings when that much is not obvious?
by alexnewman on 8/13/24, 11:36 PM
by someoneontenet on 8/13/24, 11:17 PM
by qaq on 8/13/24, 11:13 PM