by utku1337 on 7/22/24, 3:04 PM with 10 comments
by JohnFen on 7/22/24, 9:22 PM
by pavel_lishin on 7/22/24, 3:13 PM
by hnthrowaway0328 on 7/22/24, 3:11 PM
by sophyphreak on 7/27/24, 12:40 AM
I'm not a lawyer, but as other commenters mention, this would be both illegal and totally reversible because it would be a decision made due to coercion. In the same way a contract is not legally binding if someone holds a gun to your head and compels you to sign, the decision to give the coup leader control of the company wouldn't be legally binding either.
by rolph on 7/22/24, 3:45 PM
that being said, engineering the straw purchase and smurfing of shares to produce a controlling, or super-leveraging investors group sounds like what the "bad guy" does.
by tracker1 on 7/23/24, 3:56 PM
A better, imo, plan would be to convince the most impactful engineers to join you in creating a new, competing company in a location where non-compete agreements aren't binding.
by brodouevencode on 7/22/24, 3:16 PM
this narcissistic mindset is THE reason why if anything like this were ever tried, it would fail spectacularly